My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-06-04 Exh D New Cingular dba AT&T USE 19-081 (FOFCOLD&O)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-06-04 Exh D New Cingular dba AT&T USE 19-081 (FOFCOLD&O)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2020 2:24:47 PM
Creation date
7/2/2020 2:24:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
reconsider, that we continue until a time where the public has an opportunity to actually be a part <br /> of the process. That's my thoughts. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you, Mr. Darrow. Appreciate it. Any other comments on that from the <br /> Commission? Go ahead, Mr. Aguinaldo. <br /> AGUINALDO: Yes, Commissioner Aguinaldo here. I agree with Jeff on it because there were a <br /> lot of public testimonies relating to this cell tower location. So, I would like to just indicate that <br /> as well that I do agree, what our staff, Jeff, indicated as well. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you, Mr. Aguinaldo. Mr. Clarkson? <br /> CLARKSON: Yes, I have a question for Commission counsel, Malia. If we take no action <br /> today, either to approve the Findings of Fact or do no reconsideration itself, what is the status of <br /> the application? Are there time limits where it will be automatically denied or automatically <br /> approved? I'm not, I'm just not familiar with the law as to indefinite deferral. <br /> HALL: I believe this rule is 60 days, and then there would be an approval if there's no action <br /> taken today but let me go double check the rule. <br /> CLARKSON: If I may continue then while she is checking. I, I think that Jeff is right that the <br /> public is unaware of the motion for reconsideration, but I also believe that there has been ample <br /> opportunity both in person and in writing from members of the public to make their opinion very <br /> well known to all of us, and that I see little chance that a future public hearing is going to add <br /> something new to our consideration of this matter. And, so,therefore, I would ask us to, you <br /> know, put our courage to the sticking post and either approve the application or approve the <br /> Findings of Fact and provide some closure to this matter so that the Applicant can continue on <br /> with their either construction of their project or they can continue with their legal appeals. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you, Mr. Clarkson. <br /> REPLOGLE: Mr. Chairman? <br /> HALL: Sorry, let me just jump in real quick, John, and then you can go. Yeah, so Rule 7. 7-7 <br /> Planning Commission Rules within if at the close of this hearing within 60 days if there's no <br /> action, then the, basically it would be approved. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you, Malia. Mr. Replogle? <br /> REPLOGLE: I just wanted to say I agree with what Joe pointed out. We know what the public <br /> thinks and how they feel. We're going to hear it again and again for every cell tower, and it's <br /> my understanding stated earlier that we legally can't deny this. If it's not going to,the pole is <br /> not going to fall on anyone, then basically we're, we'reI don't even understand why they still <br /> come to us, but that's why I think we should move on or take the 60 days no action and they get <br /> to do it, but I would rather say go ahead and do it. Anyway, my opinion. Thank you. <br /> EXHIBIT D <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.