My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-06-18 Leeward Exh B (AMEND REZ 09-098)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-06-18 Leeward Exh B (AMEND REZ 09-098)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2020 8:56:24 AM
Creation date
8/24/2020 8:56:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
five-year window, with no ability for administrative extension, we would want to at least post <br /> notice to this body that there is a possibility that maybe at the end of the fourth or fifth year they <br /> may come in for an extension, and the extension is going to be largely driven by the just overall <br /> economic, global economic situation. <br /> CARR SMITH: Understood. Okay. Any other comments from you, Mr. Fuke? <br /> FUKE: Uh, no. <br /> CARR SMITH: Okay. Commissioners, do you have any questions of the applicant? Mike? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, well, Sid, I think you're absolutely right about the COVID pandemic and <br /> the fact that, you know, we're experiencing that now shows us what, you know, truly is meant by <br /> acts that are outside of people's control that are going to affect the outcome and compliance with <br /> these type of projectsa hundred percent agree that that's going to happen to a lot of projects. <br /> Now, that being said, looking back on the issues identified here for non-compliance, I don't see <br /> that being anywhere remotely near the same level of effect and even having the same adverse <br /> impact on the developer's ability to construct. Looking at the timing of it, the developer got an <br /> extension to complete the conditions in 2012, which expired in 2019. The archaeological work <br /> was completed in 2014, which would have given them five years to complete construction during <br /> a very strong economic period. So, to me, that, that non-compliance is not the result of things <br /> that were outside the control of the developer; they, they just didn't have the money to build the <br /> project they proposed. So I think that's one of the things that we have to consider in our role <br /> with the Leeward Planning Commission is that we have to identify what is and what isn't a <br /> legitimate reason for non-compliance. <br /> CARR SMITH: Good point, Mike. Your response? <br /> FUKE: Well, I think that if you look at this particular application, applicant, and looking at the <br /> myriad of conditions that were imposed way back when, it required a lot of redesign, a lot of <br /> archaeological things that needed to be done, not only the, having the completed archaeological <br /> inventory survey, but having prepare and getting the burial treatment plan approved, the <br /> mitigation plan, and, Mike, I'm sure that you're very aware of, you know, how laborious and <br /> time consuming that process, you know, took. <br /> VITOUSEK: Oh, yeah, absolutely <br /> FUKE: So admittedly, they did <br /> VITOUSEK: In this particular case <br /> FUKE: You know they <br /> CARR SMITH: One at a time. <br /> 6 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.