Laserfiche WebLink
CARR SMITH: You are muted. Noriko? <br /> VAN PERNIS: - - - <br /> CARR <br /> - -CARR SMITH: Okay, anybody else until we get <br /> DARROW: Rachelle, can you, can you unmute them, Rachelle? <br /> LEY: He's unmuted. <br /> DARROW: Okay, thanks. <br /> CARR SMITH: Okay, go ahead, Mark. <br /> VAN PERNIS: - - - <br /> CARR <br /> - -CARR SMITH: Go ahead, Mark. <br /> LAY: Their microphone is not on mute. It's under Noriko's name, right? <br /> CARR SMITH: Yes. <br /> LAY: Yeah, is your, something wrong with the microphone? Is Alex there to check? <br /> CARR SMITH: Okay, anybody else? Perry? Max? You have—go ahead, Perry. <br /> KEALOHA: I guess following up on Mike's questioning in light of the conversation that's being <br /> going on, so if I'm hearing this right, as far as part of the County's view on this, because they are <br /> trying to piecemeal this project to avoid certain hoops, they are not able to achieve the goal as far as <br /> this TOD is concerned. So if they were treating this as one property, could create appropriate <br /> walkways and so forth, to meet the general requirements, but because they are piecemealing it, they <br /> need to have the appropriate setbacks that will kind of be in the walkways and the properties aren't <br /> adjoined in anyway. Is that the right understanding? <br /> CARR SMITH: Christian? <br /> KAY: I think, again, under the existing zoning <br /> VAN PERNIS: Am I heard yet? <br /> KAY: under the existing zoning, it's, it's kind of impossible to get to that preferred development. <br /> It's not that we don't want to see it or anything like that; it's just kind of not possible. And it <br /> provides you what you see they're proposing is kind of these separate uses, commercial separate <br /> from housing, separate from other housing that requires getting into a car and going to commercial, <br /> and things like that. So, that, hopefully, that answers your question. <br /> 18 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />