My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-08-20 Leeward Exh A (SLU 20-000053 & REZ 20-000241)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-08-20 Leeward Exh A (SLU 20-000053 & REZ 20-000241)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2020 6:01:41 PM
Creation date
9/21/2020 6:01:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Got it, got it. I think I got that part, but, well, I guess the question is that if this <br /> area was previously designated to be affordable housing, and then the reason that the previous <br /> development zoning and land use boundaries had to be reverted was because this area was not <br /> completed with affordable housing. <br /> DARROW: It- - -yeah, there was a number of factors; this was just one of those. <br /> VITOUSEK: Right. <br /> DARROW: So they didn't just look at this particular condition, but this condition was a big part. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, there was a host of conditions that were not met, and I totally understand <br /> that. But, you know, the fact that the community benefit component in creating affordable <br /> housing in this area was one of the critical factors in reverting the zoning means that having <br /> affordable housing in this area is, is important to the, to the community. I would love to know <br /> more about the history of the, the document, if there is any documentation, from Housing and <br /> indicating what the discussions were like on the County level, because, you know, hearing the <br /> testimony, it seems like the applicants are in a very tough spot because of kind of lack of <br /> communication, perhaps, from the County - - - <br /> DARROW: <br /> - -DARROW: So this, another question that might be needed to look at is if this is an affordable <br /> housing project, is there still the opportunity to go through a 201H project, which was originally <br /> proposed, versus zoning. <br /> VITOUSEK: Right. <br /> KERN: If I could dive - - - <br /> CARR <br /> - -CARR SMITH: Go ahead Zendo. <br /> KERN: Thank you so much. Yeah, Commissioner Vitousek, something really funky happened <br /> between that community component of having 80-something affordable units for Highlands <br /> being transferred to that non-profit to being sold for profit to my clients. Obviously, my clients <br /> are still willing to comply with as much of the affordable housing as they, as they possibly - - - <br /> so <br /> - - <br /> so it's kind of a compromised situation. It's really funky. I refrain from adding in a bunch of <br /> background stuff into the report just to kind of try to keep it clean in this discussion here. This <br /> obviously doesn't look well on the County level, and again, I think it's, it's a trying one that's <br /> right on the verge. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you. <br /> KERN: And,just, I, I actually did speak to the original consultant that negotiated for <br /> 80-something units, and he said he didn't even know what happened; it's like something really, <br /> really funky happened from that time it transferred—supposedly go to the non-profit and <br /> through. <br /> 13 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.