My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-09-21 Leeward Exh B (USE 20-000083)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-09-21 Leeward Exh B (USE 20-000083)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2020 6:41:27 PM
Creation date
10/15/2020 6:41:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Got you. So, I mean, basically, it's just a replacement of the tower. Whether it's a <br /> new tower or the old tower, the same technologies could be used. <br /> MYRICK: The technolo- - -the antenna. The tower is just the structure that holds the antennas, <br /> so the tower has nothing to do with <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, it's, it's just trying to replace an older tower, and then all the antennas that <br /> will be attached to the tower are the area of the carriers, who will be doing what they're going to <br /> do with it, correct? <br /> MYRICK: That's correct. That's the technology part, yep. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep. <br /> CARR SMITH: Go ahead, Christian. <br /> KAY: I just wanted to address, some of the testifiers and the testimony that I read indicated <br /> about there being sufficient coverage. I did have a coverage map in my presentation, and I <br /> apologize I didn't share, but if we need it, I can show it. It's essentially showing what the <br /> coverage in the Kealakelcua area would be, at least Verizon coverage, if the tower wasn't there <br /> versus if the tower was there. And if you'd like, I can show that and that way you can see kind <br /> of the coverage differences as, as to address some of the concerns of the, the testifiers. <br /> CARR SMITH: Might as well since you brought it up. <br /> VITOUSEK: Now if <br /> KAY: Mike, did you want to say something before that? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, I just wanted to, to ask for clarification on that. Is that if there was no tower <br /> there at all? Or if the new tower was there versus the current tower? <br /> KAY: I'd have the applicant confirm, but I think what it's saying is if, if there was no service <br /> there, there was no coverage there, without the, without any, any tower, then it would be without <br /> any tower versus - - - so probably showing the existing coverage because of the existing tower. <br /> But also, when they do those types of studies, they take into account the height of the tower and <br /> things like that, so they probably take into account the new 260-foot tall tower. I'll just share <br /> this quickly. <br /> MYRICK: Yeah, that's correct. <br /> KAY: And so what you see hereācan you see the screen everyone? <br /> CARR SMITH: Yes. <br /> II <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.