My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-09-21 Leeward Exh B (USE 20-000083)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-09-21 Leeward Exh B (USE 20-000083)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2020 6:41:27 PM
Creation date
10/15/2020 6:41:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KAY: Okay. On the left-hand side, or let me show you on the right-hand side very quickly, this <br /> is the rough location of the existing and proposed tower here, again, mauka of the Hawaii Belt <br /> Road. On the left-hand side you'll see what the coverage would be without the proposed tower. <br /> The purple, the white area is no coverage, the purple area shows poor, and the yellow area shows <br /> good, and green would indicate excellent. With the proposed tower, you'll see most of the area <br /> is, is in that green color. So, I think that the point that I want to make here is the, the idea that <br /> there's enough coverage as it is right now is true, because there's an existing tower there; if that <br /> tower was to have to be demolished because of its structural deficiencies, and nothing replaced <br /> it, then there would be, it appears there would be a gap in coverage. I just wanted to bring that <br /> point up. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you. Commissioner Faye, go ahead. <br /> YATES: Okay, can you hear me now? <br /> KAY: Yes. <br /> CARR SMITH: Yes, we can. <br /> YATES: Okay. Okay, thank you. I'm just wanting to make sure that I understood. This new <br /> tower that's coming in is not replacing the old tower. It's a totally different tower. <br /> KAY: This new tower will be replacing the existing tower. So the existing tower's been there <br /> since 1963. It's at a point where structurally it's unsafe, as I understand it. So, the applicant is <br /> proposing to build the new tower first, move all of the service providers' antennas over, and then <br /> demolish the existing tower. It's on the same property, about 30 feet to the northwest of the <br /> existing tower. <br /> YATES: Okay, so the tower that is there now will be taken away, and it will be replaced with <br /> the tower that they're proposing now. <br /> KAY: Yes, at the end of the day that's how it will work. The new tower will be built first so <br /> that there's no interruption in cell coverage, or the emergency 911 system that the existing tower <br /> supports. Once the antennas are moved over and the new tower's operational, the applicant has <br /> represented that they will demolish the tower, and there is a condition of approval that requires <br /> the demolition of that tower within six months of the beginning of operation of the new tower. <br /> YATES: So, so in other words, if you don't have this new tower, and they took down the old <br /> tower, we'd have no cell coverages or any of that kind of coverage. <br /> KAY: At least, yeah, at least with what the applicant supplied us in terms of the Verizon <br /> Wireless coverage comparison, it appears as though there would be a gap in coverage in the <br /> Kealakelcua area, yeah. <br /> YATES: So, is this for Verizon? <br /> 12 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.