My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-10-15 Leeward Exh D (SPP 20-000219)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-10-15 Leeward Exh D (SPP 20-000219)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2020 4:34:01 PM
Creation date
11/19/2020 4:33:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CHIN: Correct. It's not that these—granting the permit is not going to erase the fact that <br /> Ms. Cash has to be responsible and accountable for the past violations. That would be something <br /> that we would work out with County Corporation Counsel and fully intend to do so. <br /> VAN PERNIS: - - - <br /> CHIN: <br /> - -CHIN: - - - county's approachI'm sorry, I'm so sorry, CommissionerI just think the <br /> county's approach is, it's this idea, keep the fines hanging over the applicant in order to get them <br /> into compliance and then once all of that is pau and set and moving forward, then you go, okay, <br /> now let's look at what these daily fines were and let's come up with an appropriate settlement <br /> now, which, that would be a normal way to reso- I mean, at least in my mind for my own <br /> experience, that would be a typical way to resolve this kind of situation. <br /> VAN PERNIS: And do you have a time frame that you could provide for that settlement to take <br /> place? <br /> CHIN: I think we would love to get it settled as quickly as possible. I think we were waiting for <br /> this very important decision to come through. And so that's the, you know, getting a yea or nay <br /> from the commission today would be very helpful towards moving us to being able to get that <br /> part resolved. Time frame, as you can see, I'm wiggling around on that. I mean I think a lot of <br /> that has to do with talking to Corporation Counsel. But I think we are motivated to try to get <br /> Ms. Cash resolved in this, you know, nobody wants this kind of litigation hanging over them. <br /> VAN PERNIS: Thank you <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you very much - - - <br /> VAN PERNIS: - - - I'd like to say that I've been to the Ranch in years past, I know some of the <br /> people who have at least submitted written testimony, and I've considered all of the things <br /> related to this hearing testimony, paperwork—and I, my bias and opinion is to, is favorable, <br /> subject to the conditions of Mr. Yee, not those of Mr. Chin submitted a day ago, because they <br /> don't serve the people, they serve Ms. Cash. So I assume the biased opinion and my <br /> announcement over here does not disqualify me from further participation in this proceeding. <br /> Thank you. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you, Mr. Van Pernis. Barbara, I think you had your hand up. Go ahead. <br /> DEFRANCO: Yeah, I was this is for Mr. Chin and for Mr. Yee. And I really appreciate the <br /> presentation. Thank you, everyone, for working on this project. But it was in this, the latest <br /> letter that we got from you, Mr. Chin, about Rule number 17, landscaping requirements, that you <br /> were asking to be deleted in its entirety, and I wanted to dispute to this. Thank you. <br /> CHIN: 17, Condition number 17-1 just want to make sure we are looking at the same thing <br /> because Condition number 17 doesn't talk about landscaping; it talks about complaint process. <br /> 18 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.