2020-10-15 Leeward Exh D (SPP 20-000219)

Home

disapprove, the people say how can you do that when there are these violations. And so just, that was for clarification. The other thing that I wanted to say is that I'm very familiar with that area there, and I know that a lot of our local people have found there, they love it, it's, you know, it's, and like they said, it's some place that has been there for a hundred years. And so, I'm hoping that, should this be something that moves forward, that they will continue to be able to have their little bridal showers, baby parties, and things like that, and that not be counted as a once-a-week thing because I am thinking that that 350 number was when you have those big parties, because those little parties are really important for people and community. Thank you. CARR SMITH: Thank you, Faye. Mr. Van Pernis, go ahead. VAN PERNIS: Thank you. Mr. Chin, is there any judgments against the applicant? CHIN: There are no judgments. VAN PERNIS: Thank you, I didn't think so. The fines or penalties are for past activities, right? And this application is for future activities? CHIN: Correct. VAN PERNIS: And do you agree that there is some past violations but no more than $197,000 worth? CHIN: Correct. What I was saying is that the $197,000 in fine, that's the only number that is in the court documents that were filed by the county. So that's all that exists. VAN PERNIS: And the 197,000 is the amount that you are, that's subject to a quotation of Mr. Yee? CHIN: Exactly. VAN PERNIS: You are not arguing that— CHIN: hatCHIN: With the county, with the county, not with, not with Director Yee but— VAN utVAN PERNIS: All right, with the county, I stand corrected - - - CHIN: - -CHIN: - - - lawyers, right. VAN PERNIS: And now, you are not arguing that this process for future activity in any way affects that. 17 EXHIBIT D