My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-10-15 Leeward Exh D (SPP 20-000219)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-10-15 Leeward Exh D (SPP 20-000219)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2020 4:34:01 PM
Creation date
11/19/2020 4:33:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
like Alex has suggested, because I've seen in a correspondence where Christie has, you know, <br /> just emails and emails of just checking in,just checking in, hey, did you get my report, hey did <br /> you get that. So,just so SHPD doesn't become the eye of the needle, because I'm also very <br /> cognizant of the time frame that's imposed in one of the conditions. But, yes, that condition <br /> suggested by Mike is perfect. <br /> ROY: We want to include the entire permit area, 15 acres, or 14.9 acres. <br /> OHIRA: I had thought Mike said the development area. <br /> VITOUSEK: My recommendation is for the project area, which is the special management, or <br /> special use permit area, which is the 14.9 acres, because there have been - - - alterations within <br /> that area outside of the 2.14 acres, with the additions, the swimming pools and other elements <br /> that are non-historic elements being put into a historic site complex that could detract from the <br /> historic integrity of those sites. Now, I'm not saying that it doesn't have its own value and is <br /> necessary in order to preserve those historic sites; it's just a process that has to be done in order <br /> to take into account the effect. And to me, that means recording what's there to the extent that's <br /> required under Hawaii Administrative Rules Chapter 13-2-84, and then using that information <br /> as the sort of baseline to make sure that the future alterations and use of this historic site as the <br /> guest ranch don't reduce the integrity of the site, change it into something that is not and make it <br /> so it's no longer a significant historic site. Basically, I understand the applicant's intentions, I <br /> think she's got good intentions; I just want to make sure that we outline a path for how she can <br /> accomplish those intentions without inadvertently causing - - -to the historic nature of this site. <br /> OHIRA: And this is an architectural inventory. <br /> VITOUSEK: That's my recommendation, but, again, under the language that's included in our <br /> background report but not included in the conditions, requiring the review from the State <br /> Historic Preservation Division prior to the completion of any new construction within the Special <br /> Permit area. <br /> CASH: Yes, I agree to that. <br /> OHIRA: Great. <br /> ROY: Okay. <br /> CARR SMITH: - - - <br /> YATES: <br /> - -YATES: Now we've lost Nancy? Nancy? <br /> CARR SMITH: Sorry, sorry, sorry. I was asking Alex—did you say that that request had been <br /> made and that State Historic Preservation had not responded? I'm not clear whether this <br /> inventory survey has been completed or not. <br /> 24 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.