My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-10-15 Leeward Exh D (SPP 20-000219)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-10-15 Leeward Exh D (SPP 20-000219)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2020 4:34:01 PM
Creation date
11/19/2020 4:33:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROY: As is typical for all projects review of 6E submittal to SHPD for review, and also during <br /> EA process they are asked to review the environmental assessment and comment on, and we did <br /> not receive any review, or any comments from SHPD, basically because I had figured that they <br /> had reviewed the site during the register process, so they felt that their review was—so we didn't <br /> hear back from them during this process. We keep actively trying to reach out to them for an <br /> archeological inventory survey, and as I said, as the staff to the CRC, that's another possibility to <br /> get the review that Commissioner Vitousek is looking to get. So, but, yeah, we were kind of left <br /> to the winds of SHPD, but we did, like I said, during the EA and during the application process <br /> we do ask them for their comment. <br /> CARR SMITH: So, Mike, will this, will the timing on this, based on your experience, affect her <br /> ability to move forward with her other, other work she wants to get started on right away? <br /> VITOUSEK: It seems as though she has a lot of stuff to get started on right away, and these <br /> conditions can be done over time. No matter what happens, you know, because this has already <br /> been submitted to SHPD for review, and in the event that they review it, they can come back <br /> with a set of conditions and requests that are different than what I might have requested, maybe <br /> more restrictive, maybe less. But if the county, as Alex is proposing, reviews this themselves <br /> through the Cultural Resources Commission, then we can move forward in good faith knowing <br /> that we have considered the effects of the special use permit on this Hawaii register of historic <br /> site and issued our approval in good faith that this will be reviewed and considered. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you for that. Mr. Winnie, go ahead. <br /> WINNIE: It's my understanding on how this process works; once you apply to impact the site, <br /> you have to have it reviewed anyway by Historic people. And it's my understanding also that <br /> this has been reviewed by them, and so I think it's not an unreasonable request, but I think it's <br /> also a duplicate request. So, I'm pretty sure that you have to go through the historic review <br /> process once you apply to change the site or the buildings, so you are not allowed to basically <br /> change - - - <br /> CARR <br /> - -CARR SMITH: Thank you. Christie. <br /> CASH: That's correct. Like I said, anything that we do going forward, the Planning Department <br /> won't even accept it; we have to go through SHPD. We have no choice. That's just, they won't, <br /> they won't even look at our plans without first SHPD approving them. <br /> CARR SMITH: Okay, thank you. Mr. Van Pernis. <br /> VAN PERNIS: The environmental review that Mr. Winnie is referring to and the archaeological <br /> inventory survey Mr. Vitousek is referring to are two different things. So the lack of response on <br /> the environmental review submittal is not lack of response on an archaeological survey that was <br /> never delivered. <br /> CARR SMITH: Thank you. Mr. Kealoha or Mr. Newberg, any comments, questions? <br /> 25 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.