My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-12-16 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
2020-12-16 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2021 4:10:30 PM
Creation date
1/25/2021 12:37:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board <br />December 16, 2020 <br />RECESS: The Chair called a recess at 10:34 a.m. to convene executive session. <br />RECONVENE: The meeting reconvened in open session at 10:46 a.m. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Thank you very much. We are now resuming the hearing. Coming back to <br />the issue at -hand. <br />There are strict rule of evidence that will not apply in this hearing, however, the Board requests <br />that all parties confine themselves to the matters connected to today's hearing and the issue <br />before the Board. If there are—if witnesses are to be used, the opposite parties will be allowed <br />to cross-examine the witness. Members of the Board may also question the witness after the <br />witnesses testimony. So, if there are no questions, then we're going to begin. <br />First and foremost—wait one second—sir, if you have an opening statement, we'd like to hear it <br />from you now. <br />APPELLANT SHOOK: Appellant Shook, not at this time, ma'am, but thank you. <br />REP. SHOOK: (Inaudible. His microphone was not on.) <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Well, it's his hearing. <br />REP. SHOOK: I would like to give an opening statement. We're going to prove that throughout <br />the process there has been some mistakes. His whole concern on this whole thing was where he <br />could better himself, where did he go wrong, and how he could better himself in the process of <br />asking that simple question, we're here today because the answer never came. The answers was <br />"not acceptable" to anybody who was going through his situation. And the more we looked, the <br />worst the questions became. That is our opening. <br />We just called to ask how he could better himself to get a better test score, was it his test, was it <br />his physical, was it this—to be told things that was just out of his reach. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Thank you. County's turn to make an opening statement. <br />MR. MUKAL Thank you, Chair. Appellant Reed Shook applied to the Hawaii County Police <br />Department to become Police Officer Recruit L During the process of gathering information <br />about Mr. Shook, the Hawaii County Police Department found that there were issues regarding <br />his suitability for becoming a police officer recruit. There were background checks that were <br />done and certain red flags were found. <br />We believe the evidence will show that the Hawaii County Police Department acted properly, <br />did not single him out in any way. But Mr. Shook will claim that a prior DUI was the cause of <br />his not being found suitable. He'll also claimed that an incident with Officer Van Reyes and <br />another—and other multitude of reasons that he was not found to be qualified. <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.