Laserfiche WebLink
Merit Appeals Board December 16, 2020 <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Is this entered into any of the exhibits. <br />REP. SHOOK: No, it's not entered into the exhibits. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Well, then, thank you very much. <br />REP. SHOOK: It was just to clarify that Mr. Shook, at that—at the time of this accident was <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Okay. So <br />REP. SHOOK: was a young boy. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: So, one second here. Out of—we have to have respect for the <br />parliamentary procedure. Do not show anything that you have not already submitted. <br />REP. SHOOK: Okay. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: We're going to—we need to stick to the issue at -hand. I'm going to ask, <br />I've been very lenient about this. Representative Shook, I need for you to do your job <br />effectively <br />REP. SHOOK: Okay. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: I need you to answer truthfully and then respectfully, along with the <br />County's case. Thank you very much. Let's proceed. Because, if not, I'm going to go back to <br />re-examination from the County. <br />REP. SHOOK: Okay. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: No more that, enough. <br />REP. SHOOK: Okay. Won't be—we won't be adding nothing in or nothingI just— <br />CHR. <br />ust <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: I thank you very much. Does the County have furth—anything further to <br />say? <br />MR. MUKAL No. Again, we would—we just object to the general line of questioning. It's <br />being irrelevant and full of leading questions. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Understood. Thank you. At this time, I appreciate this. Is there anything <br />further for the witness because, if not— <br />REP. <br />ot <br />REP. SHOOK: Yes. <br />Page 27 <br />