My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-12-16 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
2020-12-16 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2021 4:10:30 PM
Creation date
1/25/2021 12:37:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board December 16, 2020 <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: I'd like to hear it from the Board Members. <br />REP. SHOOK: Well, I have one more thing to point out that he can refer to it. So, on—it's on <br />Number 63/6. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: From this same exhibit? <br />REP. SHOOK: Communications Number 20-01.03, Exhibit 6. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Representative Shook has called into record or to attention Communication <br />Number 20-1.03, Exhibit 6—letter to Wendy Baez. <br />REP. SHOOK: I'm going to refer to the section, paragraph 2, "Generally speaking" and if you <br />go down, it'll say "lifetime" and then it'll say, "These guidelines" just go down 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, <br />7, 8, 9—and then the 10th line it says, "lifetime. These guidelines"—do you see it? <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Read it to us, sir. <br />APPELLANT SHOOK: Yes, sir. <br />REP. SHOOK: Okay. Please read these guidelines till the end of the sent—the period. <br />APPELLANT SHOOK: "These guidelines are available to all applicants as part of the <br />recruitment notice. Applicants with a criminal record that has been expunged does not <br />necessarily mean that an applicant is eligible for a position in law enforcement. Further, an <br />expungement of a criminal record does not always remove the facts and circumstances that lead <br />to an arrest." <br />REP. SHOOK: The reason I asked you to read that—do you feel that your arrest was proper? <br />APPELLANT SHOOK: No. <br />REP. SHOOK: Do you feel you was <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Sir <br />MR. MUKAL I would object. <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: why are you leading with that? <br />REP. SHOOK: No, I'm trying to say because he said criminal record, so I'm just— <br />CHR. <br />ust <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: What is your question to him? Let him answer. <br />Page 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.