My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-11-16 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
2015-11-16 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2021 8:10:32 AM
Creation date
2/11/2021 3:41:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii County Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes — November 16, 2015 <br />SF Yes, we are required to submit an annual report. <br />0 How do you mitigate for something that doesn't exist there? <br />EA: Technically, so you'll notice if you read through the HCP — we've used the <br />species recovery guidelines for creating stable populations so in, for some <br />of those species it may be that we just have to create x -amount of stable <br />populations with a minimum number per species, based on the recovery <br />guidelines for that species. <br />• So what they'll do is essentially in say one of those mitigation fences or a <br />fence that you'd think you could plant one in — it would go in there? Would <br />it ever constitute as take if that thing somehow was outside of the fence <br />and reproduces? <br />SF Yes, I guess so, but that's not a good scenario. No comment. <br />• How many of the fifteen covered plant species are currently located in the <br />forest bird sanctuary? <br />SF: All of fifteen. <br />So the whole process of this HCP then is to mitigate for the (25%) plants <br />that are outside of these exclosures? If you have all these exclosures and <br />the plants are fenced off already and they're protected, right? <br />SF: Right, there's two ways that we've come up but we cannot, say that there <br />are areas that don't harbor plants, so that's why we've gone through this <br />whole modeling exercise, so there are areas that we have a model project <br />the plants are in and that's where we get those take estimates from — but <br />we're trying to fence as many known plants as we can and that's with <br />those avoidance and minimization exclosures are for. <br />• Can the rest of the areas can be open for hunting — then why can't we <br />enhance game in those areas? Is it because the plants are going to be <br />protected in their own areas? <br />SF: If the situation was that the animals — the plants were not in the areas <br />where the animals were — we would not need to do this. It's just that they <br />are. There are a few exclosures now and there are a few plants in those <br />but across the rest of the area there are plants and the animals are <br />impacting them. <br />Its' part of the HCP — isn't part of the mitigation is to have these plants <br />fenced and protected? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.