My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-12-17 Leeward Exh B (AMEND SMA 388)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-12-17 Leeward Exh B (AMEND SMA 388)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2021 3:50:31 PM
Creation date
2/18/2021 3:50:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
So, it's my understanding that we have six conditions before us now, we want to add the whole <br /> time frame for approvals and construction, we want to add the site maintenance plan, and what <br /> else? So I need to be clear. Mike, since you took the lead on that, the time frames—Sid had <br /> offered up a revision—can you respond what you think it should be? Go ahead, Mike. <br /> VITOUSEK: If it's okay with the Chair, I'll make a motion. <br /> CARR SMITH: Okay. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, so, before making a motion I just want to state that I have definitely heard <br /> and considered the concerns of the members of the public who testified today and in writing. I <br /> agree with them that it's been too long, that the structure is an issue in the community. I <br /> personally believe that the fastest way for us to move forward with curing this issue is for the <br /> current owner to develop it in compliance with the existing conditions; I think that's what's <br /> going to solve the problem fastest. <br /> So for that reason, I'll be making a motion to grant the applicant's request for a time extension, <br /> as recommended by the director, with the following conditions in addition to the conditions <br /> already imposed: Number I is a site maintenance and security program to include an analysis of <br /> the construction of temporary sidewalks, you know, with, to be submitted to the county within 45 <br /> days for review and acceptance and, you know, any other, or the language that Sid would like to <br /> include in there from the previous motion that I left out can be added in discussion; number 2, <br /> that the project follow a timeline where plan approval will be by January of 2022, by the end of <br /> January 2022, the building permits will be submitted by the end of January 2023, and the <br /> construction will commence prior to, or commence after January 2024, prior to—excuse me <br /> will commence prior to January 2024 <br /> CARR SMITH: On or before <br /> VITOSUEK: if any of these conditions are not met, the permit will be rescinded. If—and <br /> then, so, following, the completion of the project will be December of 2025. Now, the only <br /> opportunityI think it should be included—the only opportunity for time extension would be for <br /> after the project has been commenced and construction is—what will we say, 50 percent <br /> completed? And then, if in a case that construction is commenced and 50 percent completed, <br /> then the project can apply for an additional time extension after that, but they'd have to come <br /> back to the Planning Commission to explain. <br /> CARR SMITH: All right, there's, that's a motion. <br /> VITOUSEK: So, again, you know, my words may not be the exact condition applied into the <br /> regulation. I hope that they can be summarized a little better than I can do off the top of my head <br /> when they have the time, but if the intent of that can be captured as a condition, then I would <br /> support moving forward with Diamond Resorts International completing the project as requested. <br /> 26 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.