Laserfiche WebLink
HALL: We already closed public testimony so, no further motion except for a motion for action. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. Let's would somebody make a motion for action? <br /> CLARKSON: Would you like me to repeat my motion? <br /> REPLOGLE: Yes, please. <br /> CLARKSON: I move that the petition be granted this petition for standing based on the record <br /> petitioner has established that her interest is clearly distinguishable from that of the general <br /> public and — <br /> REPLOGLE: Second, oh. <br /> CLARKSON: Okay, I'll speak to my motion if there's a second. <br /> REPLOGLE: Is there a second? <br /> RAFFIPIY: I'll second the motion. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. Okay, any discussion on the motion? <br /> CLARKSON: Yes, I'd like to just say that based on — <br /> REPLOGLE: Mr. Clarkson? <br /> CLARKSON: —based on our Counsel's consideration of the status of a petition for standing <br /> that it's better to go ahead and grant the standing and have the parties go into mediation and then <br /> take it from there. Rather than try and work out the legalities re-establishing a petition after a <br /> non-contested case mediation if you get my grip. Anyway. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay, any other comments from the Commissioners? <br /> AU: Mr. Chair? <br /> REPLOGLE: Yes, Mr. Au. <br /> AU: I just want to make a comment and I guess part of the discussion is for us fellow <br /> Commissioners part of what we want to do is we want to work with the community, we want the <br /> applicants, we want everybody to work together like our new Planning Director had said. So, <br /> I'm hopeful going into this mediation that the parties are going to come into an agreement and <br /> what the best decision is for everybody. So, I just want to repeat what Commissioner Clarkson is <br /> saying so thank you. <br /> REPLOGLE: Anybody else? Yes, Mr. Aguinaldo. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> 16 <br />