Laserfiche WebLink
REPLOGLE: Oh, okay. <br /> HALL: —discussion we should have a motion. <br /> YEH: Mr. Chair, Mr. Chair. Hello? <br /> REPLOGLE: Yes, yes Mr. Yeh. <br /> YEH: May I briefly weigh in before you have your discussion because I heard some things that I <br /> didn't want to respond to briefly. <br /> REPLOGLE: Go ahead sir. <br /> YEH: Thank you, thank you. First of all, it is not correct that this application came to be just <br /> because there had been one complaint, not because of quarantine but one of a disgruntled <br /> employee had made a complaint. But we have been working with Mr. Sussman for a few years <br /> now putting together the background information for the report and the application. You know <br /> we attempted to work with I think was in May of 2020 that we met with Keri to talk about <br /> possible resolutions of this matter. She indicated that she would get back to me with a response <br /> and never did. We reached out to her before we filed this application to let her know that we <br /> were going to be doing this even after the petition for a contested case hearing was filed, we <br /> reached out to her again saying can we talk and deal with these issues. I haven't yet heard from <br /> Ms. Keri that she wants this whole operation to stop. So, I really think it comes down to the <br /> current conditions that can be implemented discussed with her in conjunction with a plan with <br /> the Planning Department to come up with a workable solution. <br /> So, I did want to say we are all in favor of going to mediation to be able to discuss these things <br /> whether or not the Planning Commission decides to hold the contested case hearing and grant her <br /> standing. So, I just wanted to emphasize to the members of the Commission that that's our <br /> position we've always been willing to talk. So, thank you. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. Mr. Clarkson? <br /> CLARKSON: Yes, I'd like to make a motion in this matter. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. <br /> CLARKSON: I move that the petition be granted based on the record the petitioner has <br /> established that her interest is clearly distinguishable from that of the general public. <br /> REPLOGLE: Excuse me don't we have to first end this testimony and then we do what you are <br /> talking about? I would take a motion to close — <br /> JACKSON: Chair Replogle? <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> 15 <br />