Laserfiche WebLink
AREJIAN: (Inaudible—microphone on mute) <br /> VITOUSEK: You are on mute. <br /> AREJIAN: Yes, I do. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, okay. Commissioner Carr Smith, would you be okay with including that in <br /> the motion that you've made? <br /> CARR SMITH: I wouldn't have thought so, but since the applicant is suggesting it, sure. <br /> VITOUSEK: Sure, okay, and then as with the applicant's initial suggestion, do we maintain the <br /> language that was suggested by John about the contribution to a sewer district in the event that <br /> one is formed to cover this individual property? Are you guys still okay with that, John? <br /> PIPAN: I believe that would serve as a good plan B, should there not be sufficient room, given <br /> the shoreline setback and the property constraints,to then input into the capital for the <br /> improvement district. So, yes, I believe that that would be okay. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, but I see it not as a plan A and B, but as a short-term plan and a long-term <br /> plan <br /> PIPAN: Right. <br /> VITOUSEK: where short term, you know, we are trying to do what we can, put a Band-Aid <br /> on a sewage outfall, and that by converting from cesspool to septic if possible; and then long <br /> term, you guys will contribute to the sewer district if and when one is formed to serve that lot. I <br /> mean, that seems like a fairly reasonable short-term solution and a long-term solution if feasible. <br /> PIPAN: Yes, that makes perfect sense. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, with the applicant agreement, Commissioner Carr Smith, would be willing <br /> to amend the motion to reflect those changes? <br /> CARR SMITH: Can we hear what Mr. Lindsey might have to add? <br /> VITOUSEK: Of course. Mr. Lindsey, go ahead. <br /> LINDSEY: Yeah, I have a question about the feasibility of the septic system. So, yeah, we hired <br /> a civil engineer to do this feasibility, so we are, we are looking within the, yeah, obviously, <br /> within the setbacks, but we are also assuming existing construction remains, you know, all the <br /> existing permitted construction. <br /> VITOUSEK: I think that would be fair to assume that the existing construction, we don't, are <br /> not going to ask to tear down their home or a portion of their home in order to accommodate the <br /> conversion. I think that would be fair to say <br /> 18 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />