2021-03-18 Leeward Exh B (USE 21-085)

Home

I added this in just to kind of show the parking spots, so, as existing and then proposed on the top. Here is the additional parking spots that are going to be added to and then the three-car garage kind of outlined. There is not a lot of changes. A lot of the changes are interior, and again for the commissioners, note that an SMA assessment has already been approved by the Planning Department to do those interior changes in preparation for this change of use. I placed this, the proposed on top, existing on the bottom,just to show you the changes from the ocean looking towards the property, so this is from the ocean looking mauka. So you see there is very little change to the structure itself. Here is a view of the property looking south along Alii Drive. The structure itself on the right, and then you note right next to our little county vehicle the palm trees that are to be removed out of the county DPW's right-of-way. I didn't capture the tree that's going to be removed, but it's right over here on the right-hand side. Also, for your consideration,just to provide the information, there is a public shoreline access adjacent to the property. Now, it is not on the property but it is between this property and the one to the south. You can see in the picture on the left, we have the shoreline signage very clear, and then I took a shot of the actual access, which is clear and open and was easily to, you know, get down to the shoreline. So the parking is unclear, how people park here, but there were no parking, there were no, no parking signs. But, but the access is full and accessible, fully open and accessible, and the applicants will work to keep their vegetation out of that. So at this time the Planning Department's deputy director's recommendation is to approve this Use Permit with the conditions as stated. And I'll be happy to take any questions from the commissioners. VITOUSEK: Before we get into questions, I do want to mention that on February 25h, we received an incomplete petition for standing in a contested case hearing form Mr. MarkI believeRochin. This application was incomplete in that the appropriate filing fee was not attached to the contested case application, and that it was not notarized as is required to be considered for standing in a contested case hearing. The person who filled out that application is not here to present today. Therefore, his comments can't be considered to be distinguishable from that of the general public; therefore, we would have to consider his application as we would consider any other public testimony, and not consider in the light of, as contested case. With that, can we make a motion to deny the standing for contested case hearing based on the incomplete application? CARR SMITH: So moved. VITOUSEK: Moved by Commissioner Carr Smith. Is there a second? KEALOHA: I'll second that. VITOUSEK: Second by Commissioner Kealoha—now we are going to miss you guys. Any discussion? Commissioner DeFranco. 3 EXHIBIT B