My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-04-15 Leeward Exh C (USE 21-086)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-04-15 Leeward Exh C (USE 21-086)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2021 2:39:20 PM
Creation date
5/21/2021 2:39:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Okay, it's been moved and seconded now we are able to have a discussion. My <br /> understanding is the motion indicates that we are going to reduce the size from 10 to 6 and that <br /> the remainder of these conditions will be left as is. Is that correct? Commissioner Newberg? <br /> NEWBERG: That is correct, thank you for clarifying. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, discussion? <br /> VAN PERNIS: Raising his hand. <br /> VITOUSEK: Commissioner Van Pernis? <br /> VAN PERNIS: First of all, I'd like to point out that the pressure at Kaiminani and the pressure <br /> on Mamalahoa would be alleviated by the bypass road which was fortunately built decades ago <br /> by a major Palamanui developer. We could use recently unanimously voted to further defer it <br /> shows all these applications and all these things that are in related in terms of traffic we can't <br /> look at one without the other. I think since the applicant here has agreed to all access being on <br /> Leimomi and considering the pressure on Mamalahoa I think it's safer and better as the applicant <br /> looks like she's agreed to limit access to Leimomi which is an improved street now going to the <br /> property. She can instruct her guests as Mr. Newberg says but if its enforceable or if it is a <br /> necessity that the guest must comply with the suggestion or request I think it's appropriate to <br /> amend the motion to add the requirement that all access be through Leimomi Street. <br /> DEFRANCO: Raising her hand. <br /> VITOUSEK: Commissioner DeFranco? <br /> DEFRANCO: Actually, I disagree with that. I think as an applicant I would keep them both <br /> open and instruct your clients or your people to go through Leimomi and I would like to say that <br /> because there was some testimony in a letter from somebody in that area concerned that all of the <br /> traffic would be on Leimomi and asking the exact opposite. So, that is sort of in reference to <br /> looking sort at the overall picture and down the road a bit. I think it would be fine to leave it <br /> both ways and instruct with the understanding that you would instruct people and I think it is <br /> even a safer idea to have both accesses available. <br /> VAN PERNIS: Raising his hand. <br /> VITOUSEK: Commissioner Van Pernis? <br /> VAN PERNIS: This is my district. I drive up and down Mamalahoa all the time during rush <br /> hour and other times and I would disagree that it's safer for a left-hand turn under this driveway <br /> is better than going on Leimomi Street. It's not safer in any effect and I know that personally as <br /> the public has that drives on Mamalahoa and since the applicant has agreed to that I don't see <br /> why it can't be part of the motion. Thank you. <br /> DEFRANCO: Raised her hand. <br /> 17 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.