2021-06-03 Windward Exh A AT&T Mobility USE 21-000087

Home

scene our guys are going to walk into and what kind of resources we need allocate immediately to deal with the problem. So, for those separate reasons it is the Fire Department's stance that the cell phone tower in this particular case is a good thing, and we are for it. That concludes my testimony. KERN: Mr. Chair you're muted. REPLOGLE: Thank you Chief Todd. I would like a motion to close public testimony please. AU: Motion to close public testimony. AGUINALDO: I second. REPLOGLE: It's been moved and seconded that we close public testimony. All those in favor of closing public testimony say aye? Aye. AU: Aye. CLARKSON: Aye. LIN: Aye. AGUINALDO: Aye. GALIMBA: Aye. REPLOGLE: Okay, and now we will move on to your questions for Mr. Kay regarding the AT&T application. AGUINALDO: Mr. Chair I do have a question to ask Mr. Kay. REPLOGLE: Okay, go ahead Commissioner Aguinaldo. AGUINALDO: So, as far as what is being proposed before us today. I need to have clarification and a correction as far as the applicant AT&T Mobile USE 21-000087. Why is it indicating a 105-foot-tall stealth monopine and the proposed plan, site plan and information given AT&T is a 100-foot pole. So, I want to see transparency where when it boils down to what is being proposed to someone it should be transparent it should be the same because the plan shows a 100-foot pole and what is being discussed today in one of our topics this is a 105-foot tall pole. KAY: So, thank you for the question, I appreciate it Commissioner Aguinaldo. So, the pole itself, the monopole itself is 100 feet tall the extra 5 feet in height is the branches that extends above the top of the pole. So, the total height of the structure is a 105 feet so I suspect that's where the confusion comes in and I can have maybe Mr. Novak address that as well when it 5 EXHIBIT A