Laserfiche WebLink
DEFRANCO: Yes, I'm just wondering, the existing parking that is closed off, are you going to <br /> be able to use that space for your trucks so they're not going to be on Alii Drive as this project <br /> is going on? <br /> KOMATA: The means and methods for construction is, would be up to the contractor, but what <br /> we would make available to the contractor is the area of site that, the area of the site that they're <br /> impacting for construction itself, we, we're looking into the possibility of using a portion of the <br /> existing parking lot on the adjoining property as a staging area, but that hasn't been decided yet. <br /> As far as affecting Alii Drive, the contractor would not be allowed to park or stage along Alii <br /> Drive except for directly relating to the work that's being done on Alii Drive. <br /> DEFRANCO: Thank you. <br /> VITOUSEK: Commissioners, any other questions? [None.] Okay, I'll take my questions, and <br /> I'll do my best to keep within my ten minutes. <br /> The first, first question is for commissioners. Were the commissioners able to find and review <br /> the Environmental Assessment in our packet? There was a link to a website, but it wasn't clear, <br /> we weren't provided with the Environmental, a copy of the Environmental Assessment in our <br /> packet. So, I just wondered if the Commissioners had the opportunity to review the EA for this <br /> proj ect. <br /> Commissioner Van Pernis? [Nods.] You did. Commissioner Yates? [Shakes head.] No. <br /> Commissioner Kanuha? [Shakes head.] No. Commissioner DeFranco? [Shakes head.] No. <br /> To me, that's a concern in that it wasn't readily available, and the commissioners didn't, didn't <br /> necessarily have the opportunity to review that. And the second question is, I'm just wondering <br /> why the preservation plan that affects these sites wasn't included in our packet? Anybody? <br /> ROY: Are you talking, I'm sorry, Chair. Are you asking about the burial treatment plan? <br /> VITOUSEK: Well, that also would be helpful to include in the packet, but there is a second <br /> preservation plan that deals with site 21220 and 21219, which are both referenced in the <br /> conditions of this project, but there's no reference, there's limited reference in the EA but no <br /> reference in the background and recommendation about an existing preservation plan that exists <br /> on those sites, and whether or not this project is in compliance with the conditions that are <br /> already established in the preservation plan. <br /> ROY: Yeah, I, I am not sure how to answer that as it was outside of the project area. Maybe the <br /> applicant can attest to that. But the conditions, I just want to note, that the conditions that relate <br /> to those sites were put forth by the applicant as a good faith measure to ensure access to the <br /> shrine and other areas. <br /> VITOUSEK: So, I mean, you know, when we're dealing with the area of potential effect, you <br /> can, you can draw your project area however you want, right, and say this is our project area and <br /> this is the area of potential effect. It looks like you're taking into account the area of direct effect, <br /> 11 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />