My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-07-01 Windward Exh C Kirpal Meditation & Ecological Center SPP 20-220
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-07-01 Windward Exh C Kirpal Meditation & Ecological Center SPP 20-220
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2021 11:43:28 AM
Creation date
8/5/2021 11:43:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUSSMAN: Oh, we've had several surveys the most recent was 2017. Where the encroachment <br /> the actual line was delineated across our up-mountain side that borders Keri's property. And we <br /> realized at that point that we had that one-foot encroachment and the other two setback issues so, <br /> that was at that point just back 2017 or so by I forget the surveyor's name. So that's all in the <br /> records and we would be able to verify it because it's only 400 feet from one side to the other <br /> and we're going to move the buildings way beyond the 20-foot setback requirement. I don't <br /> know if that answers your question. <br /> LIN: Well, I guess my question is for the Planning Department right, how are we verifying <br /> when somebody does a complaint like this, how are we going out and verifying that there is a <br /> violation of Planning Code and setbacks? <br /> KERN: So, when a complaint would be filed then we would contact the property owner and we <br /> would go out there and we would assess it on certain areas that we wouldn't necessarily know, <br /> you know on a setback. Sometimes there's a visual observation or if there's needed then we <br /> would require that a licensed surveyor do that and actually plot that out on a plot plan showing <br /> where the location of those buildings would be. So, it kind of varies depending on the nature of <br /> the encroachment, nature of the complaint, nature of the situation but at the end of the day it <br /> would be verified by a survey. <br /> LIN: In this situation, the Planning Department did not take pictures of any violations other than <br /> what is provided by the applicant? <br /> KERN: Yeah, in this situation, in this case we're not looking at it necessarily from the violation <br /> standpoint, we are looking at it from an applicant,you know, saying this exists, this is here and <br /> we're just trying to correct it on a separate matter that would be a kind of a different, different <br /> element within the Department that handles those and sometimes there is a connection between <br /> those. But, in this case we're taking it at their word. <br /> LIN: Thank you for the clarification. <br /> REPLOGLE: Is there anything else? Well Commissioners, I'll entertain a motion for action? <br /> Mr. Clarkson? <br /> CLARKSON: I actually do have one more question for staff. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay, please go ahead. <br /> CLARKSON: So, for the Director, this is quite an extensive list of activities that are going to <br /> have to be undertaken by the applicant as far as the revised conditions go, will the conditions all <br /> have to be met before the applicant is allowed to use the property as indicated in the permit or <br /> will the applicant be able to use the property during the time period in which the conditions are <br /> being met? In other words, for the will the public be able to enter the property and rent <br /> bungalows and whatever and have retreats? <br /> 11 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.