2021-07-15 Leeward Exh C (Amend USE 05-001)

Home

SCHLUETER: Can I, can I step in real quick? So once the motion is seconded, so a motion to amend, we second the motion to amend, we can discuss the motion to amend—Did we, we got the second, so we are in discussion, right? VITOUSEK: Yep. SCHLUETER: Okay,please proceed. Just making sure. VITOUSEK: Okay. Go ahead, Commissioner DeFranco. DEFRANCO: So my concern about agreeing to that is if it took longer than 30 days for them to get their answer, then they are on the agenda, and then they don't have their answer. So I'm just wondering if there is a way to word it, so that we are sensitive to everybody's timing on this. I don't even know what our agenda is exactly for the next month. So maybe there is a way to word this and to honor Commissioner Van Pernis's thought thinking that sooner is better, and I think I'm in agreement with that, sooner is better, but I don't want to put it so tightly. That's just my opinion. VITOUSEK: Commissioner Van Pernis. VAN PERNIS: Yes, I don't think Ms. DeFranco's comment has any merit. If it's not decided in 30 days, at the August hearing we can make another motion for deferral for another date. Under, thinking of that last commentator of-60 days or 90 days or 12030 days will get everybody to move quickly. And we have to think, or I think we have to be sensitive to the time requirements for the gym money. So I think we should limit it to the August meeting, and if for some reason we think we should go further, a motion can be made then. VITOUSEK: Okay, that makes sense to me where if at the conclusion of the 30 days, the next meeting, if we feel like we still need more information, we can request another deferral at that time. So I'd be comfortable with the language as presented. Are there any other discussion? KERN: Mr. Chair, I just want, if I could just clarify, so you folks, we are going to have DPW comment, they'll show up at the next hearing, and then you are asking for a rough cost differential between whether it be on the right side of the road or left side of the road VITOUSEK: Not necessa-what I'm asking for is the applicant to analyze the feasibility of whether that makes sense for them to do it on which side of the road. You know, they don't have to do a rough cost analysis—if they've done that already, terrific but if they can look at the feasibility and whether it would be easier to do it on that side or the other side, that will be great to have that information for the next meeting. MOOERS: I think we can get that information; I think we have that information already. But it seems to me the real question is whether Public Works will allow us to build that on the other side. 19 EXHIBIT C