Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: Commissioner Van Pernis. <br /> VAN PERNIS: Yes. I would ask that the motion be amended to state that the deferral be till the <br /> next meeting in August in hopes that we can get answers by then and vote up or down. <br /> VITOUSEK: Would you like to make a motion to amend the main motion on the floor? <br /> VAN PERNIS: Yes, I'd like to move to amend the main motion, your motion, to defer to, defer <br /> to the date of the August commission meeting. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Is there a second? (No audible response) Second by Commissioner <br /> Armbruster. All those in favor—Do we need a roll call vote or can we, can we do show of hands <br /> for this? <br /> DUNN: In favor of the amendment? <br /> MOOERS: (Inaudible response to Mr. Dunn) <br /> SCHLUETER: A roll call <br /> VITOUSEK: We do a roll call? <br /> SHLUETER: That would be best. <br /> CAMERO: Commissioner <br /> VITOUSEK: (Indiscernible—simultaneous speech) motion <br /> CAMERO: Sorry, sorry, I got so ahead of myself, go, you can go, Chair, sorry. <br /> VITOUSEK: I was just saying roll call vote for the motion to amend the motion on the floor. <br /> CAMERO: And the motion on the floor is to defer this application and the amendment until the <br /> August hearing after the applicant and the county have facilitated a conversation between the <br /> Department of Public Works, correct? <br /> VITOUSEK: So the motion, the current—the main motion on the floor is to defer until we can <br /> have the information but the current motion that we are voting on is a motion to amend the <br /> main motion to bring, to add that it will be deferred until the August Leeward Planning <br /> Commission meeting. <br /> DEFRANCO: What if it takes longer, Mike, for them to get the answer? And they come back in <br /> 30 days and they don't have the answer? <br /> 18 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />