Laserfiche WebLink
but the money is there to do it independently. We also have relationships with very reputable <br /> banks here in San Diego. So the money is not the problem; it's being able to build something at <br /> the cost that we are comfortable with. <br /> VITOUSEK: So given the extension (indiscernible–echo and broken connection) you have the <br /> money to complete the project? <br /> NORTH: You did break up there, but is the question do we have the funds to build the project? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep. <br /> NORTH: Yes, we do have the funds so we could build this project. <br /> VITOUSEK: And you will allocate those funds to building this project, if the extension is given, <br /> in the timeline? <br /> NORTH: I would have to confer with the team to say that's absolutely a definitive decision, but <br /> that's the intention I've been given in the short time I've been put on this project. <br /> VITOUSEK: I mean, for us, end result, the condition of issuing permit is that it will be built, so <br /> it doesn't make sense for us to issue a permit, if we don't think it's going to be built. So we <br /> would need a commitment from your group that, yes, if you issue this permit, we will build. <br /> NORTH: I can, I mean, the reason why I would hesitate is because there have been things that <br /> happen in the last year or two that were just unprecedented and un-we could never have, have <br /> expected, but the intention is to build. As long as the cost for the project of those that we are <br /> comfortable with them where we can make a return on the investment, then, yes, it would be <br /> something we would build, but it's certainly something that we need to investigate further and <br /> explore. I can't—and again, I've been on this for two weeks, so I'm talking in general terms <br /> because I can't say that matter-of-factly. <br /> FUKE: Mr. Chair, can I just make one comment to that? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep. <br /> FUKE: You know, normally, the condition would allow the planning director to grant an <br /> administrative extension. In this case here there is no provision. So the short answer to your <br /> question is that if they don't comply with the window of, construction window, they are back <br /> before the Planning Commission, and I'm sure like all of these, most of you commissioners will <br /> still be here. And I know you all have elephant memory, so. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah <br /> YATES: Yes <br /> 18 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />