Laserfiche WebLink
SCHLUETER: I think, folks, I think we are getting a little far into discussion here with lots of <br /> opinions and things. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. <br /> SCHLUETER: Let's try and stick to our questions. We'll discuss in just a moment. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. So with that, can we have a motion to <br /> FUKE: Mr. Chair, can I just make one final comment— <br /> VITOUSEK: <br /> ommentVITOUSEK: Okay. <br /> FUKE: to address like one of the questions that was raised by the commissioners? Yeah, I <br /> think that Commissioner DeFranco had raised a very interesting, made a very interesting <br /> observation about the view plane impact the project would have on the Life Care facility. <br /> Normally, if my understanding of the SMA rules is accurate, the view plane considerations are <br /> important usually from a public highway perspective and not necessarily neighbor to neighbor. <br /> But notwithstanding the, you know, that criteria, it is important to remain neighborly. So in this <br /> particular situation, fortunately, there is like ample space to kind of adjust, you know, the <br /> placement of buildings. And so—and it was comforting to hear what Maija had mentioned that <br /> in checking the topography, the subject property is like 10 feet lower than, you know, the Life <br /> Care facilityso, you know, I, I would kind of like want to encourage the developer, and, you <br /> know, they are here, that during the course of the Plan Approval process, prior to submitting the <br /> plans for plan review, that at least have some consultation with representatives of Life Care <br /> Center to see like how possibly buildings could be massaged to address their concern. But at <br /> least give an opportunity for the Life Care Center to weigh in on it, and the Plan Approval, you <br /> know, that information obviously would have to be transmitted to the planning director as part of <br /> the Plan Approval process, and maybe the Planning Department through that process can <br /> modify, if appropriate, some of the placements of the structure. And I,personally, I think that <br /> just only being the good neighbors. <br /> VITOUSEK: Thank you. With that, again, is thereI think time is good to seek a motion to <br /> approve, deny, or defera motion that's at hand to the agenda item? Commissioner DeFranco. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay, so, I move the application to amend the Special Management Area permit, <br /> docket number 286 be approved based on the planning director's recommendations, which shall <br /> be adopted. So I need a second. <br /> VITOUSEK: Second from anybody? (No audible response) okay, seeing noneoh, <br /> Commissioner Armbruster? <br /> ARMBRUSTER: Yep, I second. <br /> 24 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />