My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-07-15 Leeward Exh E (Comm 183)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-07-15 Leeward Exh E (Comm 183)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2021 11:26:15 AM
Creation date
8/19/2021 11:26:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
article in the newspaper about the same time, or approximately the same time, as this letter. <br /> Maybe just a coincidence, but that's the situation. Who's next? You guys, which one of you is <br /> next as far as your votes or your, the way you talk to people or question people? You've seen, <br /> since my schooling by Mr. Yamamoto [sic], my activities in front of you. Are they out of order? <br /> Of course not. No more than anybody else's. I believe that the council [sic] is supposed to ask <br /> questions of the Planning Department and of applicants, and that those questions aren't always <br /> going to be pleasant nor call for pleasant answers, but the questions have to be made. I don't <br /> think it's inappropriate to pursue them. If you make this recommendation as point of order, you <br /> are out of order because this concerns my role as a commissioner, not a land use planning matter. <br /> So I don't believe you have jurisdiction. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, question that I have for our newest commissionerwelcome to the <br /> commission—do you believe that you have enough information in order to make a vote or do <br /> you need additional time for you to consider the full scope of what's happening, in order to <br /> review the documentation? <br /> ARMBRUSTER: Sure, sure, you know, I, if I need to vote to make something move forward <br /> today, I think I would be to ask for more time, if you need my vote in that. <br /> SCHLUETER: Just to remind everyone, a quorum vote does need to be met to move forward, or <br /> to forward or to take any action, which means four votes are needed to take any action either <br /> direction. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, in that case I think it makes sense for us to defer this application until we <br /> have the full commission here to weigh in on it. Commissioner Yates. <br /> YATES: Who are we, I'm, who are we missing? <br /> VITOUSEK: We are missing CJ, Commissioner Kanuha. <br /> YATES: I'm sorry? <br /> VITOUSEK: Commissioner CJ Kanuha. <br /> YATES: Okay, oh, he's the only one missing? <br /> VITOUSEK: He's the only one missing, yep, and then that will give Commissioner Armbruster <br /> enough time to watch <br /> YATES: Right— <br /> VITOUSEK: <br /> ightVITOUSEK: previous minutes, to review the information. You know, for those of us who <br /> have been in there the whole time, the three, Commissioner Yates, Commissioner DeFranco, and <br /> I, we don't need a story from Commissioner Van Pernis about his behavior; we've lived through <br /> it <br /> 16 <br /> EXHIBIT E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.