2021-07-15 Leeward Exh E (Comm 183)

Home

YATES: Right. VITOUSEK: —every month for the last two years. So, asking about hard questions, with conflict of interest, those of us who have been here, we don't, we don't need any of that because we've lived through it, but I would like to give our new commissioner, Commissioner Armbruster, and Commissioner Kanuha the opportunity to YATES: `Ae. VITOUSEK: fully consider the facts, to consider Commissioner Van Pernis's perspective. So I think that a deferral of this item would be appropriate. So I would SCHLUETER: So I'm going to just help in there. You may want to withdraw the current motion because of the fact that it's a motion to take action, and then make a new motion for the deferral. DEFRANCO: I withdraw. VITOUSEK: Okay, the motion was withdrawn. Would you make a new motion to defer this agenda item? DEFRANCO: I have one question. What—you know, the County Council is meeting when? And this is when they are going to, they've asked this to come back before them? Isn't it in SCHLUETER: The mayor's recommendation does come before the County Council on August 3rd DEFRANCO: So is there any YATES: (Indiscernible—simultaneous speech) they could—sorry. DEFRANCO: Go ahead. YATES: They could make a decision without us having to do anything? SCHLUETER: They, it will come before them, and it will be up to the County Council whether they are going to make, take action on that agenda item. YATES: Okay. SCHLUETER: Excuse me, it's the Planning, it's County Council Planning Committee,just to be clear. VITOUSEK: So no matter what, they have to take action twice; the Planning Committee has to forward a recommendation to the full council, and then the full council would have to have the final authority. So no matter what, we can get our comments in in a timely manner. 17 EXHIBIT E