My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-07-15 Leeward Exh E (Comm 183)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-07-15 Leeward Exh E (Comm 183)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2021 11:26:15 AM
Creation date
8/19/2021 11:26:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
multiple Chairs to mute you time and time again, and then have no consequences simply because <br /> now you are going to change your ways. <br /> "When the Mayor has to ask the County Council to remove you, you should be humble and <br /> realize you screwed up. When three Chairs that you have worked with all think that your <br /> behavior warrants removal, as well as fellow commissioners who disapprove of you, former <br /> applicants and consultants who you have insulted time and time again, they support your <br /> removal. I would think that you would not want to be a part of that group. I certainly wouldn't <br /> push to be a part of a group that doesn't want me there. Sometimes you have to admit that it's <br /> not a good fit and take the high road and step down. <br /> "Mr. Van Pernis's response to the agenda item number 4 was full of misrepresentations, full of <br /> lies. He said that the mayor only asked for his removal when Mark questioned the planning <br /> director's potential conflicts of interest. Wrong. I can say as a matter of fact that eyes have been <br /> on this commissioner for most of last year. Bad behavior was trumped with worse behavior over <br /> and over. He said he was supported without exception by the community; well, there were many <br /> exceptions. He said that the County Council supported him to remain a commissioner; wrong, <br /> they voted to defer for three months. He said this agenda item should differentiate between the <br /> time before Mark was caught, and the time after Mark was caught. That's ridiculous; a true <br /> professional will always behave appropriately, not when asked to, but because it's the right thing <br /> to do. <br /> "With this agenda item, you have an opportunity to let the County Council know how you feel <br /> about having a fellow commissioner be such a disruption, how the time during meetings is <br /> dominated by one commissioner. Chairs shouldn't have to spend so much time and effort to <br /> control anyone's behavior or have to feel the need to protect fellow commissioners, applicants <br /> and staff. This is your opportunity to be heard on the matter. Please don't hesitate to admit and <br /> recognize that this commissioner is guilty of disgracing Planning Commission rules, guilty of <br /> violating code of ethics sections as well. It cannot continue. Mahalo for listening." <br /> So that was a letter from, that was a letter from Nancy. And I have one also from <br /> VITOUSEK: Commissioner DeFranco, you've got two minutes of your allowed 10-minute time <br /> left. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay, so I, I do have one from, from Keith Unger: <br /> "Hi, my name is Keith Unger, and I served on the Leeward Planning Commission for seven <br /> years, the last five years of my term I had the privilege of serving as its Chair. I lobbied against <br /> Mr. Van Pernis's nomination to the Leeward Planning Commission and had concerns upon his <br /> confirmation. My last hearing as commissioner on the Leeward Planning Commission was <br /> Mr. Van Pernis's first hearing." <br /> The following is an email that he sent to the County Council. Anyway, he said: <br /> 8 <br /> EXHIBIT E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.