My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-07-15 Leeward Exh E (Comm 183)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-07-15 Leeward Exh E (Comm 183)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2021 11:26:15 AM
Creation date
8/19/2021 11:26:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
"I'm hoping you've already heard about our Leeward Planning Commission hearing this past <br /> Thursday, but in case you haven't, I wanted to express my concern. Yesterday's LPC hearing <br /> was what I had anticipated. The Leeward Planning Commission struggled all day to move the <br /> agenda forward. Commissioner Van Pernis was unprofessional, rude, combative, got into <br /> arguments with applicants, spoke over applicants,pointed fingers and was not interested in <br /> working through the process to find common ground." <br /> Anyway, that's how Keith feels also. These are the, these are your Chairs. And I was on the <br /> CDP for many years and chaired it, and it's very difficult to run a meeting and have to manage <br /> someone the whole time where you are trying to have a meeting. So these are just some of the <br /> reasons why this is how I feel. But I am really looking forward to seeing how everybody else on <br /> the commission feels. So, thank you. <br /> VITOUSEK: Thank you. Okay, any other commissioners? Discussion? (No response) I'd like <br /> to say that when this originally came up for action by the corporation counsel [sic], I did not <br /> necessarily support the removal of Commissioner Van Pernis. I wanted to give him the <br /> opportunity to correct his behavior, and we initiated some corrective action, worked with him to <br /> accommodate any, any ADA issues, to give him the best chance for success. It wasn't until after <br /> we did the effort to provide retraining, to provide updated ADA compliance procedure where he <br /> can submit in writing, and he continued the behavior that many of us find inappropriate, that I <br /> thought, you know, I don't know what other recourse we have. <br /> In looking at the testimony from Commissioner Van Pernis, specifically, item VII says, "At no <br /> time did a previous or present Chairperson invoke Robert's Rules of Order to object for <br /> decorum, or rule any question or statement out of order, or use the rules to punish or discipline <br /> my 2020 and early 2021 activity." And that's just outright false, I mean, that's documented to be <br /> false. I provide a list of incidents where behavior was addressed: <br /> February 2020 meeting, repeated interruptions and hostile questioning of an applicant led <br /> Corporation Counsel Malia Hall to declare your questioning out of order and state that"If <br /> you are not going to act in a civil manner, we are going to ask you to leave,"to which you <br /> responded to Corporation Counsel, "I think you are out of order;" <br /> At the February 2020 meeting, there was a personal attack on an applicant, Brian Cook, when <br /> asked if he had ever declared, if he had ever personally declared, bankruptcy. The applicant <br /> asked, "Why so personal?" And the chair asked you to refrain from personal attacks; <br /> September 21, 2020, Cross-examination style questions of members of the public testifying <br /> on a Special Permit application. You asked, "Are you aware that this application violates <br /> state land use regulations?" The applicant stated they believed you were asking leading <br /> questions that prevented a fair and impartial discussion. And your questions were deemed <br /> unduly repetitious by Chair Carr Smith; <br /> On August 20'', Commissioner Van Pernis's questioning of traffic engineer Randall Okaneku <br /> was deemed to be unduly repetitious by Chair Carr Smith; <br /> 9 <br /> EXHIBIT E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.