My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-07-15 DRAFT Joint Hearing Exh B
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-07-15 DRAFT Joint Hearing Exh B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/3/2021 12:14:34 PM
Creation date
9/3/2021 12:14:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: Yes, I have a question as to about Rule 2-1, Initiating of Rulemaking <br /> Proceedings. Did the Department pay it's non-refundable filing and processing fee of five- <br /> hundred dollars? <br /> DARROW: The Departments are exempt. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. <br /> CLARKSON: Well, then that should be an amendment to these rules then, because the <br /> interested person or agency has to pay the fee. Where does the fee go anyway? <br /> DARROW: I believe it goes in a general fund. An agency could be a private agency as well but <br /> when it comes to County agencies; Department of Parks and Recreation or Public Works or <br /> Planning they are exempt from having to pay the filing fee. <br /> CLARKSON: Shouldn't that be in our rules? <br /> DARROW: That would be good to discuss in our future rule changes. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. I would be happy to entertain a motion to move forward here. <br /> GALIMBA: I will make that motion so that we can move on to the next step, yes. <br /> REPLOGLE: Second? It's been moved by Ms. Galimba, seconded by Ms. Defranco, yes, no? <br /> DEFRANCO: I think that the motion has to be put forward with the amendments. So, you need <br /> to state that motion a little bit and then we can second it. So, you would say something like I <br /> move that the application to amend the Use Permit number 05-001 is that where we are? No, <br /> sorry. I'm sorry, but you have to cite it and then state with the proposed amendments and then <br /> you can get the second. <br /> GALIMBA: So, since we're at it, let me get clarity then. On the amendments that we're <br /> discussing, so there's the amendments that were published and there's the amendment that Ms. <br /> Campbell read into the record I believe. Are we contemplating having that amendment to our <br /> amendments be what we decide on today? <br /> DARROW: As well as Commissioner Galimba, as well as the just clarification that instead of <br /> keeping the word "original"that we just reference that particular document throughout the rules. <br /> And again, this was something that was brought out at Board of Appeals, and everyone agreed <br /> that was more practical. <br /> GALIMBA: I see, there seem to be very much sort of a housekeeping measure, a clarity <br /> measure. The other amendment, I kind of forgotten already what that was about. Could we <br /> restate that other that language again? <br /> CAMPBELL: Yes, are you looking for the revision to Rule 4-30? <br /> 13 <br /> EXHIBIT B (DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.