2021-07-15 DRAFT Joint Hearing Exh B

Home

YATES: Aye. JACKSON: And Chair Replogle? REPLOGLE: Aye. JACKSON: Okay, the motion carries with ten (10) ayes, one (1)no and one (1) abstain. CLARKSON: So, in the last 90 seconds, can I just have a clarification, then after since this has been approved. Just for example, Rule 6 Special Permits, non-refundable filing fee this would be 6-3 (b). We've substituted something for the word"original". What is actually going to be here for "original" in Rule 6 Special Permits 6-3 (b)? CAMPBELL: In that case, that rule is talking about a petition for a Special Permit will be filed, so the "original"would be the petition for the Special Permit. CLARKSON: So, (b) instead of saying "original" it will say application for Special Permit? CAMPBELL: Or yes or petition for Special Permit. DARROW: Or just a — CAMPBELL: Document. DARROW: Yeah. CLARKSON: Okay, well I'm — DARROW: The application. CAMPBELL: Actually, I think in that case, "- - -"maybe to just have the list, it doesn't need to be anything there, because what that"original" indicated was that it was an original of all of the things in the list. So, the application form itself is actually 7 number 1. So, I think it would just (b) 1 Application Form; Description of property;plot or site plan; in that case `original" doesn't add anything. CLARKSON: Well, my point being that we still don't know we've had a petition for Special Permit, application for Special Permit. No use of the word "original"whatsoever and we've just voted that in and yet we still have no idea what's actually going to be right after the parenthesis (b). I think that we were premature and voting on stuff that we don't really know what it's going to look like on the written page. That's just a final comment, it's almost time for Leeward' s meeting. KERN: I'll speak to that real briefly. I think the intent is very clear on what it is, it's either going to be the application speaking to that particular application. But what we can do, I 19 EXHIBIT B (DRAFT)