2021-07-15 DRAFT Joint Hearing Exh B

Home

appreciate everybody's vote in moving this forward so can begin the process. I'm happy, though, Mr. Clarkson to bring this back through with those specific languages and for you guys to look at it and you can take a vote on that again to put that specific language in there. I don't see a problem with that if that would please the Commission. CLARKSON: It would certainly please me to be able to see exactly what we're voting on. GALIMBA: I agree, that would be great. That way we'll know. REPLOGLE: Mr. Aguinaldo? AGUINALDO: I totally agree with our commissioner because he hit it on the nail. We're talking about this, is it we're just saying so, pleasing people because there's multiple areas that says "original". So, with consideration to our Planning Director, if we go back around and vote again later on down the road because I got multiple areas that says "original" in that language. So, like what Joe indicated 6-3 (b) there are areas, multiple areas that says "original". So, are we going to go back around on this? KERN: You know — AGUINALDO: Commissioner, yeah, go ahead. KERN: The intent was to clean it up as how we did for BOA, that came up at the Board of Appeals hearing to clean that up. AGUINALDO: Okay. KERN: Even leaving it as original it still has the same intent, except it's a digital format so it'll be cleaner if we specified what those documents were. I think it's very clear for the record on what the intention is and I'm happy to come back through, like I said and do a quick housekeeping on that to spell it out. But I think the intention is extremely clear if that were a barrier or altered from that, that anybody would be able to challenge that and see that that wasn't the case. So, I think as long as we stay with what the intent is which is what we will be doing. We can certainly clean that up for you guys and apologize about the format. REPLOGLE: Mr. Van Pernis? HALL: Can I just jump in real quick, sorry. Point of order, the Leeward Planning Commission meeting was supposed to have started now. So, you may wrap up your discussion at this point. Is there anybody that would be testifying for the next Commission meeting? JACKSON: Yes. HALL: Okay, are they on yet? JACKSON: No, they are not in the waiting room yet. 20 EXHIBIT B (DRAFT)