Laserfiche WebLink
2. Discussion and recommendation on Planning Department procedures for processing <br /> requests for time extensions on permit and rezone ordinance amendments heard by the <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> Chairman Vitousek introduced this item at 10:29 a.m. and called on a motion so that discussion <br /> could take place. No motion was made, and the Commission moved onto the next agenda item. <br /> PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT <br /> Report on July 2021 Special Management Area (SMA) determinations, minor permits <br /> and enforcement action issued by the Planning Director. <br /> At 10:30 a.m. Chairman Vitousek called upon staff to address this agenda item. <br /> Mr. Kay stated that the staff was in the process of working out a way to generate the SMA report <br /> from the new Electronic Processing and Information Center ("EPIC") system that the Planning <br /> Department had just transitioned into, and that they would be sure to present a report inclusive of <br /> the past months unreported. In response to Commissioner Kanuha's question, Mr. Kay said that <br /> the report could be expected at the Commission's October meeting. <br /> Director Kern reported that the EPIC system was working well through fixes and tweaks and a <br /> lot of training to staff, as one would expect with any new digital system. He said that despite the <br /> apprehension and concern that the department staff initially felt, they were now seeing the <br /> potential in this software. He said that a third party had just been contracted, who would help <br /> create SMA reports. He further said that the current dip in the operation productivity caused by <br /> the time spent for staff training should soon reverse, and that they would see a lasting positive <br /> outcome with an increase in productivity. <br /> AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING <br /> At 10:33 a.m. Chairman Vitousek introduced this item and asked if there were any proposals <br /> from the commissioners. Commissioner Yates asked if the Commission would revisit the matter <br /> of time extension procedure, which was on today's agenda as unfinished business but not <br /> discussed. Chairman Vitousek responded that it could be agendized again, if any commissioners <br /> felt that further discussion was necessary in addition to what had been discussed at the April 15, <br /> 2021, meeting. Asked by Commissioner Yates, Chairman Vitousek recalled that the April <br /> discussion indicated that it was within the Commission's rights to put in its own conditions of <br /> approval, with consideration of the passage of time, including no further allowance for time <br /> extensions. Deputy Corporation Counsel Schlueter advised that if the Commission wished to <br /> discuss the matter under Unfinished Business Item 2 on the agenda, a motion should be made in <br /> order to do so. No motion was made. Mr. Kay offered to individually answer any procedural <br /> questions that Commissioner Yates might have. <br /> Commissioner DeFranco said that information on roads and other infrastructure plans would be <br /> helpful to the Commission in making decisions, and that she would support such a topic to be <br /> agendized. Chairman Vitousek noted that a request had been made before for a series of <br /> 3 <br /> Leeward Planning Commission <br /> August 19,2021,Meeting Minutes <br />