My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-09-22 EMC minutes draft
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Agendas
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
2021-10-27
>
2021-09-22 EMC minutes draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2021 1:58:46 PM
Creation date
10/14/2021 1:58:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Adams said that for herself that sounds reasonable, and it’s something that we could <br />work offline with the Department in working onways to minimize Mr. K’s cost. It is a <br />community service that you are providing, and she would be interested in other comments <br />from Commissioners. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fulton suggested soliciting volunteers from among the Commission to get a <br />small group together to work with Mr. K’s. What they are asking is very reasonable. She would <br />like to see a few Commissioners work on that. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Gaffney wondered if we could move this forward more quickly. <br /> <br />Motion and second.Vice Chair Gaffney made a motion, to which Commissioner Fulton <br />seconded,“that we ask the County consider reimbursing Mr. K’s for the collection of non-HI-5 <br />glass.” <br />Discussion: <br />Commissioner Fulton said it’s always easy to go to the County and say, we want you to pay for <br />something, but it goes hand in hand with a mechanism for funding. <br />Chair Adams said it occurred to her that perhaps one route is the residential tipping fee credit, <br />when haulers are taking residential waste, which was a previous controversy a few meetings <br />ago. She asked if they can be treated in that way, because what we are dealing with is <br />residential waste essentially. And she would be willing tobe in the conversation to see what <br />kinds of accommodations could be made. She asked for a possible revision of the motion, by <br />not putting the solution into the motion that the County pay Mr. K’s, but that the County works <br />out a way to reduce the cost that Mr. K’s is facing by winding up with all this glass that could be <br />recycled. <br />Commissioner Fulton said this circles back to agenda item 5-b(1), for extended producer <br />responsibility. <br />Chair Adams said that is the Advance Deposit Fee model, which is to pay more money, and it <br />would have to be more than twice as much to cover additional costs. Maybe this meeting is not <br />the best place to figure out what the best solution is. <br />Withdrawal of motion.Vice Chair Gaffney agreed, and withdrew the motion. He said the <br />discussion should continue. There may be other parties besides Mr. K’s that should be <br />considered in this motion. Let’s be sure that we are being broad and not just focusing on a <br />single business, although we do appreciate the work that he does, the Vice Chair said. <br />Commissioner Cardwell mentioned, for example, Atlas Recycling Centers. They may be a good <br />organization to reach out to because they do a lot of recycling as well, and she imagines they <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.