2021-09-16 Leeward Exh B (Item 1 SPP 21-227)

Home

DARROW: Yeah, this particular road there are times that we require an applicant to allow, to include the driveway access to a particular use, that's usually when the driveway is specific to that particular use—in this particular case, this road was actually going to be used in a much bigger capacity, not just for the Special Permit. Our condition in there is that this road become compliant to the requirements of the Kona CDP for that particular alignment. So it will, hopefully, in the future be utilized as one of these collector roads for compliance with the CDP. VITOUSEK: So ANDREWS: This VITOUSEK: do they, do they have to build the road to dedicable standard, the Kakalina extension? Is that a part of this? DARROW: Not, not to that standard, but at some point it could be utilized as, you know, as long as that alignment is in it, it can be built to a higher standard in the future, especially when the remainder of the property comes in for what they are proposing. We wouldn't require dedicable standards for this road for a simple Special Permit, but if they came in for a change of zone and a subdivision, at that point we would consider. ANDREWS: This shows just kind of a simple graphic of where the Kakalina Street currently exists,just to the north of the property. And on the aerial map there, sorry, the aerial photograph, you can see the road exists here. And so it would need to be aligned, that access would need to be aligned with that road corridor. VITOUSEK: And, is, was that portion of the required improvements factored into SHPD's review of the project area? Because if you are looking at using an existing gravel road to access an existing building, there is not going to be much impact on historic sites, but if you are talking about relocating the road to a previously undeveloped portion of the property, that's something entirely different. And if we are conditioning that, then I would like to know if that has been reviewed. And it's unclear from the letter from SHPD exactly what was submitted to them and reviewed by them. ANDREWS: SHPD reviewed the application and the supplemental information as existed in about July of this year. VITOUSEK: Did that include the location of the realigned driveway? That we are because they may not know that was part of it, since it's a condition now coming from us. ANDREWS: They probably don't know that, that's correct, I think you are correct on that point, because that was a condition that we, that we have decided as important to the Planning Department, and it's something that wasn't originally proposed by the applicant. DARROW: Can you, Jessica, can you stop sharing? I can bring up the actual CDP map that shows the alignment real quick. So, Mike, in I'm sorry, Chairman Vitousekin regards to 10 EXHIBIT B