Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: All the, all of the owners of the apartment have consented to having you <br /> represent <br /> SMITH: Yes <br /> VITOUSEK: okay <br /> SMITH: that is correct. <br /> VITOUSEK: Thank you. Is there any other questions for Mr. Smith? [No response] Okay, <br /> Mr. Pipan, do you have anything to add at this point? <br /> PIPAN: Yes. Thank you, Chair[echo]—sorry, bit of an echo thank you, Chair Vitousek, for <br /> asking. My questions would basically echo yours. Was there any formal communications or <br /> determination ahead of the petition for standing that documented this decision, or is it an <br /> after-the-fact kind of piling on? And, you know, each of the members of the, or owners, at the <br /> Ala Ka La Condominium had the opportunity to submit their own petitions for standing as well, <br /> so if Mr. Smith is representing them each individually, I think they should have had their own <br /> petitions in the case or the AOAO should have had some more formal documentation of their <br /> request and representation in the matter. <br /> VITOUSEK: Deputy Director Darrow, do you have anything that you would like to add here? <br /> DARROW: I agree that this is, you know, especially with this situation that Mr. Smith is in, that <br /> this isn't a clear, you know, there isn't clear direction for somebody that's going through this <br /> process that might not be familiar with it. With that said, the Planning Department doesn't have <br /> any objection to allowing standing for the AOAO. In the past when we had contested cases <br /> where there were numerous intervenors, if the concerns and issues were the same by all the <br /> intervenors, we basically put them together as one intervention, as one contested case petition, <br /> because all the issues were the same. Even if all the other association owners submitted, we <br /> would probably do the same in this case, because the issues would be clearly the same. Thank <br /> you. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Commissioners, are there any questions on the standing of Mr. Smith as <br /> representing the Association of Apartment Owners? [No response] Okay, is there, someone <br /> make a motion to clarify Mr. Smith's capacity in which standing was granted? Basically, <br /> seeking a motion to acknowledge that Mr. Smith was granted standing in the contested case to <br /> represent the Ala Ka La Association of Apartment Owners. <br /> KANUHA: I think, make a motion to grant Mr. Smith representation of the Ala Ka La's <br /> Association and for sending contested case hearing. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Delilah, does that motion work for our purposes? <br /> 3 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />