Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Connections' opening briefs on appeal) z As a result, the unvacated and <br /> unappealed findings remain in full force effect and are binding on remand. <br /> The following outline sets forth the findings and conclusions that the <br /> Intermediate Court of Appeals did vacate and those findings and conclusions that <br /> the Court did NOT vacate on appeal and that Connections did not assign as error <br /> on appeal. <br /> ICA Decision Finding or Conclusion <br /> Subiect Page No. Affected by ICA Decision <br /> Affect on surrounding FF 17, 18, 46, 47 NOT <br /> properties (traffic) 18 to 23 VACATED. <br /> Source of 60 gpd data <br /> ("where that figure 25 to 27 FF 21, 48, 50, 51 vacated. <br /> came from") <br /> Applicants' ability to <br /> develop a potable water 26 FF 49 NOT VACATED. <br /> source <br /> No evidence applicant <br /> can provide sufficient --- FF 22 NOT VACATED. <br /> water for the school NOT ASSIGNED AS ERROR <br /> ON APPEAL. <br /> Restrictive view of <br /> guideline 6-3(b)(5)(D) Last sentence in FF 52 <br /> that school must 28 to 29 erroneous and therefore <br /> "service the needs of vacated. <br /> its immediate neighbors" <br /> Suitability of land for <br /> agricultural uses 29 to 32 FF 55 vacated. <br /> ? Rule 28(b)((4) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure requires an appellant to assign <br /> error to specific findings and conclusions for the purpose of appellate review. If an appellant <br /> does not assign error to a specific finding or conclusion, the finding or conclusion stands. <br /> Sprague v. California Pacific Brokers &Insurance, Ltd., 102 Haw. 189, 195-196, 74 P.3d 12, <br /> 18-19 (2003). <br /> 4 <br />