My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11-02-2021 Intervenor - Exceptions to WPC Proposed FOF, COL, DO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
*Background/Recommendation Reports (June 2020-Sept 2022)
>
2021
>
2021-11-04 Windward
>
Item #3 Connections/CBESS (SPP-12-000138)
>
11-02-2021 Intervenor - Exceptions to WPC Proposed FOF, COL, DO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2021 12:17:34 PM
Creation date
11/2/2021 12:16:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Change in essential FF 57 NOT VACATED. <br /> character of the land --- NOT ASSIGNED AS ERROR <br /> ON APPEAL. <br /> General Plan FF 59 and 62 vacated. <br /> consistency 39 to 42 COL 5 vacated. <br /> Burden of proof FF 63 vacated. <br /> for Special Permit 42 to 43 COL 4 vacated. <br /> B. <br /> The Remand Hearings <br /> At its first meeting on remand, on August 5, 2021, the Planning <br /> Commission ruled that it will not receive or consider new evidence and will <br /> confine its action on remand to the record that was established for the post-May <br /> 2014 appeals. Nevertheless, at its subsequent October 7, 2021 hearing, the <br /> Planning Commission allowed, over the Intervenor's objection, Connections to <br /> offer new evidence regarding actual water usage of another school in Puna as well <br /> as at its present school, demographics, USDA grants and community outreach, <br /> matters that are not contained in the original record. <br /> At its October 7, 2021 action meeting on remand, the Planning <br /> Commission voted to approve Connections' request for a Special Permit based on <br /> the former planning director's October 2012 revised recommendations. (See <br /> proposed Finding No. 21, at Page 4; Transcript: Oct. 7, 2021, Page —) However, <br /> in 2014, the Planning Commission had rejected the revised recommendations and <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.