My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-12 Redistricting Commission Agenda Packet
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2021 Redistricting Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2021-11-12 Redistricting Commission Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2021 3:48:28 PM
Creation date
11/5/2021 3:48:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
scale to some extent. They can't be these weird irregular shapes and I will talk about this <br /> in a moment a little bit later in the agenda, about the blocks. I have concerns about some <br /> of the blocks, of course. But when we're dealing with these districts, you want to try and <br /> keep them as uniform as possible without these weird cutouts and things like that. <br /> Thanks. <br /> YOSHINA: So, this is Dwayne. <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Yoshina. <br /> YOSHINA: Yeah, those are all block boundary descriptions. There's another place for <br /> input on that. I think a work session that has been suggested is the way to go. I would <br /> concur and I would like to have that done. I don't know if it's an appropriate comment at <br /> this point. But to Mr. Hustace, and this is said with a lightness, you cannot really touch <br /> District 2 because that's mine. (Laughter.) I will begrasp the levity of that statement. <br /> HUSTACE: Thank you, Mr. Yoshina, for your comedy. <br /> YOSHINA: I have a question of our Corp Counsel. We're talking like this now, and it's <br /> an open session but, what's the limitations as to sharing maps and stuff like that? <br /> MELLON-LACEY: I think that if two people can share and work together and share <br /> information. But otherwise, it has to be done as a group. And even when we're talking <br /> about training because the training is for business, there's no way around at learning to <br /> use this as board business and it's going to engender conversation. Which is a <br /> conversation you've been having today, and I think it's very good conversation. I think <br /> when you think about all the dilemmas you're having trying to play with this data. And <br /> then when you took example maps and went out in communities to have these hearings, <br /> you're really going to get an earful from people about"No, you can't do that," or"This is <br /> a great idea!". But it is a process and I really feel your dilemma with this short timeframe <br /> that you're faced with, but even the training, I think you'd have to do with just two <br /> Commissioners at a time. <br /> BATH: Question. <br /> KOSSOW: Ms. Bath. <br /> BATH: Thank you. If the training was broadcasted like this, where the public was, it was <br /> totally transparent, our discussions were transparent, and the public actually got to be part <br /> of the training so that they could learn how to use the tools effectively, would that be <br /> okay? Would that be feasible? <br /> MELLON-LACEY: If it's done publicly, and noticed as a public meeting, and the agenda <br /> is for training, and the public can get out their computers and participate as well, then we <br /> wouldn't have a Sunshine Law issue. But how hands-on would that be able to be? I don't <br /> know because I don't know what the kind of training Cori would do would typically be <br /> 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.