My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-12 Redistricting Commission Agenda Packet
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2021 Redistricting Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2021-11-12 Redistricting Commission Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2021 3:48:28 PM
Creation date
11/5/2021 3:48:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
like. I can understand, when I saw the training we had at the second meeting, if you <br /> didn't already know the program, that was probably a little hard to just into it. I'm not <br /> equipped to answer that question other than to say if it's noticed as a meeting, public has <br /> the opportunity to participate, and you're able to do an effective training that way, then <br /> that's fine. <br /> BATH: May I make a comment? It would seem to me, since this is a public process and <br /> we are soliciting the public's input, that the public, if I wasn't on the Commission, I <br /> would really appreciate having an opportunity to be taught how to use this program so <br /> that I could give the input that we're soliciting from them as a Commission. So, it might <br /> actually be a really good thing if we can do it. <br /> MELLON-LACEY: I agree with you. I think if the public wants to do plans using this <br /> software, training is probably critical for them as well. <br /> KOSSOW: I'm sorry, Ms. Bath, you still have the floor. Ms. Lui also has a question. <br /> BATH: Oh, I'm sorry. I yield. <br /> KOSSOW: Okay, thank you. <br /> LUL I was just going to ask Ms. Bath whether she wanted to make it in the form of a <br /> motion that we schedule, as soon as practicable, this training session, giving a week for <br /> the public to have notice of it. <br /> BATH: So moved. <br /> LUL Okay good, and I'll second it. <br /> KOSSOW: I'm sorry, was that a motion by Ms. Bath, and then seconded by Ms. Lui. <br /> Okay. <br /> Ms. Bath moved to schedule a training session. <br /> Seconded by Ms. Lui. <br /> KOSSOW: So, is there any discussion? (No response.) I think the only question I have is <br /> for Ms. Mellon-Lacey regarding the session timeline and if we schedule an education <br /> session, would that hinder some of the proposed timelines that we already have? <br /> MELLON-LACEY: I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. <br /> KOSSOW: Correct me if I'm wrong, under the Charter we were supposed to complete <br /> certain things by certain sessions. And I want to be sure that if we schedule an education <br /> session as an agenda item meeting, that it doesn't mess up anything that's in our proposed <br /> timeline. <br /> 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.