Laserfiche WebLink
WATANABE: We already decided on 4.a. and b; and that is going to go up. <br />RHO: But that timeline, was today the absolute deadline or could the Director <br />th <br />and the applicant have agreed to extending it further to, let’s say, March 20? <br />WATANABE: That was debated at the previous meetings -. <br />RHO: Right, and they agreed -. <br />WATANABE: There’s some -. <br />RHO: Not agreed but -. <br />WATANABE: Well they agreed to extend -. <br />RHO: One or both parties would not extend past today. <br />th <br />WATANABE: The maximum to January 11, which is -. <br />RHO: Which is today -. <br />WATANABE: This meeting today. There’s some question as to whether even that is <br />allowable. <br />RHO: Right. <br />WATANABE: The Director took the liberty and said, look, I’ll extend as far as <br />th <br />January 11. <br />RHO: Okay, so how about Item No. 5? <br />WATANABE: Item No. 5 is an applicant-initiated request for a time extension; and the <br />rules are clear on that one, the applicant has the ability to request an extension. <br />RHO: So that was extended from a previous meeting’s -? <br />WATANABE: Right, right. It was continued; and at some point I think it was even the <br />July or maybe even the August meeting where even the Commission requested that it be <br />continued. <br />RHO: There’s no, I guess I’m looking for an absolute deadline and I won’t find <br />one, right? <br />WATANABE: On this, as long as the Commission is willing to agree with the applicant -. <br />EXHIBIT D <br />10 <br /> <br />