2008-01-11 TKOHALA LLC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

WATANABE: And E is related to – “In conjunction with Final … the Department of Water Supply.” – the fire hydrants and all that. You’re not going to bond that, right? LIM: I think these are, I think, you know, I’ll suggest some more language but there’s a standard condition the Planning Department uses that says that instead of building all these improvements -. WATANABE: Right, right. LIM: For final subdivision approval you can file a bond. And so I’ll change that language. WATANABE: Okay. LIM: I just wanted to see why you did that. Okay. And I see the height limit and the setback requirements. WATANABE: The height limit was an exact replica of what we had approved in the SMA Permit for Belt Collins. LIM: The Belt Collins’ one you’re talking about is the one for Kohala Makai? WATANABE: Belt Collins is, I had thought Belt Collins was an acre or one-acre Ag, but in actuality the Director was being consistent when he said 5-acre Ag. LIM: That was the next door property? WATANABE: I’m not exactly sure if it’s next, immediately adjoining. However, I do know that it was in the immediate vicinity and I believe that’s the same one the Director was referring to with regard to an SMA Permit. That was not a change of zone. It was just simply an SMA Permit. LIM: Okay, I understand what you’re getting at now. So I can take that to the client. WATANABE: I’m trying to create as much consistency and send a message that we are trying to be consistent. But in this event you already had vested rights, and so we’re trying to make a compromise. I’m just trying to act as a mediator. But that does not suggest that this is the final language. I’m just trying to jump-start something so maybe we can get to some amicable solution. RHO: Mr. Chairman? WATANABE: Yes. RHO: Today we had a, I guess a definite timeline for 4.a. and b. EXHIBIT D 9