Laserfiche WebLink
this point as a matter of the rules and of law that we will go ahead and continue it to the next <br />meeting and then, you know -. <br />th <br />WATANABE: No, it’s March 20. <br />th <br />TORIGOE: I’m sorry, the March 20 meeting. <br />WATANABE: Comment -? <br />RHO: Which doesn’t then require a vote? <br />TORIGOE: Right. <br />RHO: Is that what you’re saying? <br />TORIGOE: Right. <br />RHO: Okay. I have a question. You know, we have written records now of what <br />we each said and discussed, etc. etc. What actually goes up to the Council if, in fact, this thing, <br />th <br />this Item Agenda 5 gets continued to March 20? Does anything dealing with Item No. 5 <br />besides maybe the minutes go up to the Council? <br />TORIGOE: Yeah, the whole transcript basically would be going up at this point, <br />everything you’ve discussed. <br />RHO: How about the notation that we were in discussions about this draft? <br />TORIGOE: It’s all in the transcript. <br />RHO: It’s all in the transcript. But not necessarily in a specific cover memo to <br />the decision that was made for No. 4? I mean I don’t know what the form is. I mean you guys <br />do a special thing for No. 4, and No. 5 just gets included in the minutes and sent up? <br />WATANABE: I’m lost. What do you mean by special thing for No. 4? <br />RHO: I’m not sure because I’m not sure what exactly happens at the Council <br />level -. <br />WATANABE: I think if any -. <br />RHO: But I guess my problem is that these two issues are so interrelated -. I <br />agree that if we could have gotten the parties together, and you guys encouraged them three <br />times at least in my presence, to actually reach a compromise, that’s what we wanted but we <br />couldn’t get it. All No. 5 does, and what to me this does, is try to reach a compromise for them <br />after we voted inconclusively, but we voted and we’re going to send up a negative <br />EXHIBIT D <br />18 <br /> <br />