2008-01-11 TKOHALA LLC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

recommendation on this rezoning thing. So if the Council votes in favor of the Director’s recommended rezoning, all of this becomes moot, right? WATANABE: Exactly. RHO: So what I want to know is what actually and how it gets sent up to the Council, because I think what would happen is you’re going to just make them even more confused as to what we as a body either agreed to or disagreed to do. WATANABE: Well, for the record, we never agreed to do anything. We couldn’t agree. TORIGOE: At this point basically if we just say that, all right, we think that the rules th allow for the applicant to request at least one more continuance to March 20, one of the things we were talking about doing if there were a continuance was adding a notation to the transmittal of the default negative recommendation on 4.a. and 4.b., adding to that notation that there is a request for extension still being considered before the Planning Commission, just to inform them that the story is still going on and they can expect more. RHO: Okay, I would personally prefer that we actually had a vote on extending th the timeline to March 20 instead of as you are recommending -. WATANABE: Well, yeah, there was a motion and it was seconded, but then you wanted to comment so we didn’t vote. RHO: I know, but then our counsel though is recommending that you just decree that -. WATANABE: Well, because you brought up the probability that we would have no outcome out of the vote -. RHO: Right. WATANABE: Which is a real probability; and that’s how we got to this point. So if -. RHO: Well, I think that probability has lessened because I need to put this to bed, or we need to put this to bed. But I don’t want this to be put to bed by you just flat out decreeing that this is extended. I think that the Commission should take a vote to extend or not extend. WATANABE: You meaning counsel? RHO: Huh? WATANABE: You meaning counsel? EXHIBIT D 19