2021-11-18 Leeward Exh C (Items 1 & 2)

Home

ANDREWS: ―Chapter, right. It’s Condition L, so it requires all construction shall comply with Chapter 27, Floodplain Management of the Hawai‘i County Code, so. DEFRANCO: Okay. Well, thank you for that and I can see why there’s some expectation on the part of Mr. Metzler to look at what is laid out here, and then to present a plan to us that could conform to the CDP Plan. Thank you. VITOUSEK: One thing I would like to add on that while we’re looking at the CDP map there to address it. The CDP map splits it into those two categories, the yellow which is described as being part of the town and then the green being the Small Farms and Ranches Preservation Program and that boundary falls along the lines of the State Land Use urban district. So, it’s because of that existing State Land Use Boundary classifying that as urban district, which is why you have that split on this one property were part of it within the yellow and part of it’s with the green. DEFRANCO: Thank you. KERN: Just to add further to that conversation, if you look at the, can you pull up the LUPAG map? ANDREWS: Yes. KERN: So, the LUPAG map, which is this, which is the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map, or the General Plan shows the medium density urban and the low density urban and so there’s a little bit of a conflict with that low density urban component. Per the CDP with the preservation area and per the General Plan when there’s a conflict between the General Plan and the CDP the General Plan is the overriding document. So, that’s why we ended up supporting it for this, when there was the crossover of the General Plan had not, then we would probably have not supported the backside of it would only looked at the front side of it. So, you’re seeing 3 different areas there that all kind of come together and it’s really close just some history there. DEFRANCO: Mike if I could just ask one more question. I’m also glad that you clarify this idea of monster homes being made there, and so I’m assuming, and this is just a question for Mr. Metzler. You’re looking at this as part of building the community up, not a speculation on your part of some kind of fast turnover? METZLER: No. Barbara, can you hear me? DEFRANCO: Yes, I can hear you. METZLER: No. I think fast turnover on this property is not an inoperable situation, but the plan is to create a few house lots. Keep them as affordable as possible and sell them as vacant lots so our community can build a house there to their liking. We are in the process of creating some CC&R’s or covenants, if you will, that will require a tasteful architecture there in keeping with the local community. 12 EXHIBIT C