2021-11-18 Leeward Exh C (Items 1 & 2)

Home

lane from Earl’s Pa‘auilo Store driveway to the beginning of the left-turn lane at Keaka Kea Place 2) minimum 100-foot spacing should be provided between the intersections on Māmalahoa Highway at Waikelehua Place, and West and Center Driveways, and Earl’s Pa‘auilo Store Driveway/Ishihara Farm Road. We wanted to add “and” and then 3) a minimum of and our change is to 20 feet distance should be provided between the edge of the circular roadway and the future widening of its travelway on Māmalahoa Highway. And we wanted to add “at both commercial zone driveways”. So previously the condition said that there should be a minimum of 25 feet between the edge of the circular road widening from Māmalahoa Highway to the internal road. But upon further consultant with our traffic consultant, what happened was he had based the figures on a 10-foot road widening extension from Māmalahoa Highway and there’s a condition in the rezoning ordinance that it should be 15. So hence we’re going from a minimum of 25 to a minimum of 20 feet distance from the edge of the circulatory road and the future road widening and again the clarification is that those are just at the driveways. The driveway entrances, which was the intent of the traffic consultant. And lastly, we were going to delete number 4 of Condition J. This is traffic signal warrant analysis should be considered at the Māmalahoa Highway intersections at Waikelehua and at Keaka Kea Place by the Year 2040. The reason for the request of that be deleted is because is again in consulting with our traffic consultant, that was not a recommendation for this applicant per se, because the development period for this project is 5 years. The recommendation of traffic single warrant analysis should be considered by 2040 was really just a generalized recommendation not specific to this application. So again, I believe you were emailed these changes and we request that Condition J be amended accordingly. VITOUSEK: Thank you. Okay, Commissioners anybody would like to make a motion, if only for the purpose of discussion? Commissioner DeFranco? DEFRANCO: For the purpose of discussion, I’m giving a favorable recommendation. I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council on the application for the State Land Use Boundary Docket PL-SLU-2021-000001 based on the Planning Director’s recommendation. Do I do one for the second one too, so we can talk about both at the same time? VITOUSEK: Dalilah what do you say? SCHLUETER: We are going to need motion for each. Each one is going to have a separate motion. So, I don’t think that there’s going to be, I think we all understand that this entire project crosses over it in discussion. So, I don’t think there’s a problem and having a group discussion over the entire project, but they’ll have to be a separate motion for that second application agenda item 2. DEFRANCO: So, I would wait to do that then? Yeah, okay. SCHLUETER: That’s correct. 19 EXHIBIT C