My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-18 Leeward Exh C (Items 1 & 2)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-11-18 Leeward Exh C (Items 1 & 2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2021 5:52:45 PM
Creation date
12/16/2021 5:52:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />DEFRANCO: Alright. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: We have a motion on the floor is there a second? Second by Commissioner <br />Armbruster. Now we― <br /> <br />KERN: Mr. Chair? <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Go ahead. <br /> <br />KERN: If I may request maybe a 5-minute recess before we get into discussion. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Sure, no problem. <br /> <br />KERN: Thanks. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: We’ll take a quick 5-minute recess. <br /> <br />Chairman Vitousek called a short recess at 11:42 a.m. He called the hearing back to order at <br />11:49 a.m. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: So, we have a motion on the floor moved and seconded to send a favorable <br />recommendation and this is on the State Land Use Boundary Amendment. Is that correct? <br />Okay, so at this time, Commissioners, we can open it up to discussion. <br /> <br />DEFRANCO: Um’ Mike? <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Yes. <br /> <br />DEFRANCO: Before we do, do we make now the recommendation for the second part, so we <br />talked about both at the same time, are we wait? <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: I think it’s okay for us to discuss everything on this one motion, and then we can <br />make a secondary motion actually another motion at the conclusion of this one. So, I think it’s <br />okay for us to have our discussion now, so you could vote on this one, and then do another <br />motion for the second part of the agenda. Okay. Discussion. <br /> <br />PAISHON-DUARTE: I appreciate the thoughts that were shared by the applicant, however, <br />with an overwhelming amount of testimony in opposition to this project and in review of the <br />CDP with Waimea Policy Number 1. Stating Preservation of Waimea‘s Sense of Place shall be <br />the principal, overarching land use policy for Waimea. I am not in favor. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Commissioner DeFranco? <br /> <br />DEFRANCO: I know that we have more letters from the office showing opposition. But it felt a <br />bit to me like it was, and I don’t know but maybe it was motivated by one person who had a <br />20 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.