My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-01-05 tclark
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-01-05 tclark
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 8:41:41 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 8:41:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM: That sounds reasonable. Mr. Torigoe, do you have any comments on that? <br />TORIGOE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Yeah, I would, I was going to bring up <br />Condition N if nobody else did. Basically it does sound like the Director has the authority to <br />initiate and it says “may” initiate rezoning. And at this point we don’t really have a clear <br />inclination about whether Condition E was met or not. And as the Director noted Condition C is <br />still open, therefore they can request a time extension until sometime in 2007. And so at this <br />point the state of the record is that the Director has not initiated rezoning of the subject property <br />to its original zoning. And I think if you did go ahead and if there was a rezoning passed then <br />that could have expressly basically superceded the original rezoning in any case. So I think it’s <br />well within your authority to just go ahead at this point; and you should probably get some input <br />from the applicant also regarding those issues. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA: In order to make sure that our “i’s” are all dotted, etc. and that we aren’t <br />setting a bad precedent would it be wise for whomever makes the motion to approve, and I <br />knows I’m jumping the handle, to include the fact that the motion would also repeal the previous <br />ordinance based on noncompliance, so it would be part of the record at that point? So when it <br />comes up before the Council they would both be dealing with the repeal and a change of zone? <br />YUEN: Well, I wouldn’t do that because the prior ordinance is not on the agenda. <br />That’s the one thing I wouldn’t do definitely.I do think that, I’m comfortable if we go ahead <br />and this thing passes that the prior ML zone Ordinance 97-93 is repealed by implication and <br />none of the conditions that apply to that ordinance stand. <br />GRAHAM: Any further questions from Commissioners? All right. Will the <br />applicant/or representative please come forward. Could you please raise your right hand so I can <br />swear you in at this time. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter now before the <br />Hawaii County Planning Commission? <br />LIM: I do. <br />FRANCIS: I do. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Thanks for your patience while we were discussing the legal <br />issue. <br />I also had no one here signed up to give testimony from the public. Usually we would swear <br />them in at this time also. Is that correct, there’s no one here from the public to testify on this <br />time? <br />NOMURA: Correct. <br />GRAHAM: All right, thank you. Go ahead, Mr. Lim. <br /> EXHIBIT A 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.